Under new management will America's dedicated CSAR forces finally thrive in AFSOC?

Approved for public release; distribution in unlimited. === On 1 October 2003 the USAF transferred control of its CONUS-based combat search and rescue(CSAR) assets from Air Combat Command to Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC). Transferto AFSOC was CSAR's fourth major reorganization in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cline, John D.
Other Authors: Jansen, Erik
Format: Others
Published: Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1278
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-1278
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-12782017-05-24T16:06:57Z Under new management will America's dedicated CSAR forces finally thrive in AFSOC? Cline, John D. Jansen, Erik Robinson, Glenn E. Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Defense Analysis Search and rescue operations Special forces (Military science) United States Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) Special Operations Forces (SOF) Organizational Theory Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) Approved for public release; distribution in unlimited. On 1 October 2003 the USAF transferred control of its CONUS-based combat search and rescue(CSAR) assets from Air Combat Command to Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC). Transferto AFSOC was CSAR's fourth major reorganization in twenty years, and was the latest in a turbulentprocession of attempts to improve the combat effectiveness of CSAR forces. Despite possessing anabundance of brave, motivated, and extremely capable personnel yearning to accomplish their mission, dysfunctional organizational arrays and nagging organizational constraints have prevented USAF dedicatedCSAR forces from "getting to the fight" for the onset of hostilities in three of this nation's past four majorarmed conflicts. Special operations forces had to fill the void. This analysis evaluates CSAR's positionwithin AFSOC's organizational array to determine if this latest reorganization is likely to produce durableimprovements in CSAR combat effectiveness. My conclusion is that "CSAR friendly" organizational cultureand effective organizational constructs within AFSOC Headquarters, combined with highly receptiveattitudes among CSAR crewmembers, form a historically unique organizational mix that favors the long termsuccess of CSAR forces in AFSOC. To ensure AFSOC's favorable organizational posture is translated toimproved combat capability, leadership must immediately increase CSAR representation on HHQ staffs. Major, United States Air Force 2012-03-14T17:31:09Z 2012-03-14T17:31:09Z 2004-12 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1278 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. xiv, 96 p. : ill. (some col.) ; application/pdf Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Search and rescue operations
Special forces (Military science)
United States
Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR)
Special Operations Forces (SOF)
Organizational Theory
Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC)
spellingShingle Search and rescue operations
Special forces (Military science)
United States
Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR)
Special Operations Forces (SOF)
Organizational Theory
Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC)
Cline, John D.
Under new management will America's dedicated CSAR forces finally thrive in AFSOC?
description Approved for public release; distribution in unlimited. === On 1 October 2003 the USAF transferred control of its CONUS-based combat search and rescue(CSAR) assets from Air Combat Command to Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC). Transferto AFSOC was CSAR's fourth major reorganization in twenty years, and was the latest in a turbulentprocession of attempts to improve the combat effectiveness of CSAR forces. Despite possessing anabundance of brave, motivated, and extremely capable personnel yearning to accomplish their mission, dysfunctional organizational arrays and nagging organizational constraints have prevented USAF dedicatedCSAR forces from "getting to the fight" for the onset of hostilities in three of this nation's past four majorarmed conflicts. Special operations forces had to fill the void. This analysis evaluates CSAR's positionwithin AFSOC's organizational array to determine if this latest reorganization is likely to produce durableimprovements in CSAR combat effectiveness. My conclusion is that "CSAR friendly" organizational cultureand effective organizational constructs within AFSOC Headquarters, combined with highly receptiveattitudes among CSAR crewmembers, form a historically unique organizational mix that favors the long termsuccess of CSAR forces in AFSOC. To ensure AFSOC's favorable organizational posture is translated toimproved combat capability, leadership must immediately increase CSAR representation on HHQ staffs. === Major, United States Air Force
author2 Jansen, Erik
author_facet Jansen, Erik
Cline, John D.
author Cline, John D.
author_sort Cline, John D.
title Under new management will America's dedicated CSAR forces finally thrive in AFSOC?
title_short Under new management will America's dedicated CSAR forces finally thrive in AFSOC?
title_full Under new management will America's dedicated CSAR forces finally thrive in AFSOC?
title_fullStr Under new management will America's dedicated CSAR forces finally thrive in AFSOC?
title_full_unstemmed Under new management will America's dedicated CSAR forces finally thrive in AFSOC?
title_sort under new management will america's dedicated csar forces finally thrive in afsoc?
publisher Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1278
work_keys_str_mv AT clinejohnd undernewmanagementwillamericasdedicatedcsarforcesfinallythriveinafsoc
_version_ 1718452541362012160