Analyzing Department of Defense's use of other transactions as a method for accessing non-traditional technology
As U.S. Defense budgets and military research and development spending experienced significant decline between 1988 and 1998, the Defense Technology and Industrial Base essentially merged with the national industrial base. DOD reform occurred more slowly than changes in the private sector fueled by...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
2012
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1133 |
id |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-1133 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-11332017-05-24T16:06:51Z Analyzing Department of Defense's use of other transactions as a method for accessing non-traditional technology Gilliland, John E. Lamm, David V. Doyle, Richard B. Management As U.S. Defense budgets and military research and development spending experienced significant decline between 1988 and 1998, the Defense Technology and Industrial Base essentially merged with the national industrial base. DOD reform occurred more slowly than changes in the private sector fueled by advances in technology. U.S. national security relies upon the ability of the military to maintain technological superiority. To attract advanced technology companies that normally do not participate in defense business to the defense market, Congress provided a new contracting authority, Section 845 Other Transaction Authority (OTA). This study examines the effectiveness of its byproduct, Section 845 Other Transactions (OTs). Opinions and performance data regarding the effectiveness of Section 845 OTs were solicited from non-traditional companies that participated in OTs from 1994 to 2000. Significant disagreement was found within the Federal Government concerning the definition of a non-traditional company. It was also found that DOD does not quantify the amount of technology it accessed with OTs. Many of the non-traditional companies with which DOD participated in OT-based relationships came from markets where significant defense business already exists. In sum, DOD achieved uncertain and varied success in using OTs to achieve their stated. US Navy (USN) author 2012-03-14T17:30:40Z 2012-03-14T17:30:40Z 2001-12 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1133 266854 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted. xii, 117 p. ; application/pdf Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
As U.S. Defense budgets and military research and development spending experienced significant decline between 1988 and 1998, the Defense Technology and Industrial Base essentially merged with the national industrial base. DOD reform occurred more slowly than changes in the private sector fueled by advances in technology. U.S. national security relies upon the ability of the military to maintain technological superiority. To attract advanced technology companies that normally do not participate in defense business to the defense market, Congress provided a new contracting authority, Section 845 Other Transaction Authority (OTA). This study examines the effectiveness of its byproduct, Section 845 Other Transactions (OTs). Opinions and performance data regarding the effectiveness of Section 845 OTs were solicited from non-traditional companies that participated in OTs from 1994 to 2000. Significant disagreement was found within the Federal Government concerning the definition of a non-traditional company. It was also found that DOD does not quantify the amount of technology it accessed with OTs. Many of the non-traditional companies with which DOD participated in OT-based relationships came from markets where significant defense business already exists. In sum, DOD achieved uncertain and varied success in using OTs to achieve their stated. === US Navy (USN) author |
author2 |
Lamm, David V. |
author_facet |
Lamm, David V. Gilliland, John E. |
author |
Gilliland, John E. |
spellingShingle |
Gilliland, John E. Analyzing Department of Defense's use of other transactions as a method for accessing non-traditional technology |
author_sort |
Gilliland, John E. |
title |
Analyzing Department of Defense's use of other transactions as a method for accessing non-traditional technology |
title_short |
Analyzing Department of Defense's use of other transactions as a method for accessing non-traditional technology |
title_full |
Analyzing Department of Defense's use of other transactions as a method for accessing non-traditional technology |
title_fullStr |
Analyzing Department of Defense's use of other transactions as a method for accessing non-traditional technology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analyzing Department of Defense's use of other transactions as a method for accessing non-traditional technology |
title_sort |
analyzing department of defense's use of other transactions as a method for accessing non-traditional technology |
publisher |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1133 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gillilandjohne analyzingdepartmentofdefensesuseofothertransactionsasamethodforaccessingnontraditionaltechnology |
_version_ |
1718452410973683712 |