Investigation of the 25 January 2000 East Coast cyclogenesis.

On 25 January 2000, a rapidly developing cyclone tracked up the East Coast of the United States. Along with this system, 12 to 18 inches of snow fell on major cities from North Carolina to Washington DC. This snowstorm deserves special consideration because of the poor numerical and human forecasts...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schmeiser, Gregory J.
Other Authors: Wash, Carlyle H.
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/10847
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-10847
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-108472014-11-27T16:09:15Z Investigation of the 25 January 2000 East Coast cyclogenesis. Schmeiser, Gregory J. Wash, Carlyle H. Meteorology and Physical Oceanography On 25 January 2000, a rapidly developing cyclone tracked up the East Coast of the United States. Along with this system, 12 to 18 inches of snow fell on major cities from North Carolina to Washington DC. This snowstorm deserves special consideration because of the poor numerical and human forecasts it received. The goal of this work is to analyze the performance of the Navy models, NOGAPS and COAMPS (West Atlantic) with the 25 January cyclogenesis event. Deficiencies with the model analyses and forecasts are identified and a diagnosis of critical model fields that led to these deficiencies is completed. Preliminary investigation of analyses and NOGAPS forecast runs with the new variational data assimilation system, NAVDAS, concludes the research. The results of the research reveal that NOGAPS poorly forecast storm tracks while COAMPS showed more success. Both NOGAPS and COAMPS produced deficient short range upper-level height forecasts and had difficulty analyzing two prominent jet streaks. NOGAPS was not able to adequately analyze or forecast cold air damming and coastal frontogenesis, while COAMPS was more successful at resolving these features. COAMPS produced better precipitation forecasts than NOGAPS, but still showed deficiencies. Preliminary investigation of NOGAPS using NAVDAS shows promise. 2012-08-22T15:33:55Z 2012-08-22T15:33:55Z 2001-03 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/10847 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, it may not be copyrighted.
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description On 25 January 2000, a rapidly developing cyclone tracked up the East Coast of the United States. Along with this system, 12 to 18 inches of snow fell on major cities from North Carolina to Washington DC. This snowstorm deserves special consideration because of the poor numerical and human forecasts it received. The goal of this work is to analyze the performance of the Navy models, NOGAPS and COAMPS (West Atlantic) with the 25 January cyclogenesis event. Deficiencies with the model analyses and forecasts are identified and a diagnosis of critical model fields that led to these deficiencies is completed. Preliminary investigation of analyses and NOGAPS forecast runs with the new variational data assimilation system, NAVDAS, concludes the research. The results of the research reveal that NOGAPS poorly forecast storm tracks while COAMPS showed more success. Both NOGAPS and COAMPS produced deficient short range upper-level height forecasts and had difficulty analyzing two prominent jet streaks. NOGAPS was not able to adequately analyze or forecast cold air damming and coastal frontogenesis, while COAMPS was more successful at resolving these features. COAMPS produced better precipitation forecasts than NOGAPS, but still showed deficiencies. Preliminary investigation of NOGAPS using NAVDAS shows promise.
author2 Wash, Carlyle H.
author_facet Wash, Carlyle H.
Schmeiser, Gregory J.
author Schmeiser, Gregory J.
spellingShingle Schmeiser, Gregory J.
Investigation of the 25 January 2000 East Coast cyclogenesis.
author_sort Schmeiser, Gregory J.
title Investigation of the 25 January 2000 East Coast cyclogenesis.
title_short Investigation of the 25 January 2000 East Coast cyclogenesis.
title_full Investigation of the 25 January 2000 East Coast cyclogenesis.
title_fullStr Investigation of the 25 January 2000 East Coast cyclogenesis.
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of the 25 January 2000 East Coast cyclogenesis.
title_sort investigation of the 25 january 2000 east coast cyclogenesis.
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/10847
work_keys_str_mv AT schmeisergregoryj investigationofthe25january2000eastcoastcyclogenesis
_version_ 1716721563212972032