A comparison of numerical methods to solve fractional partial differential equations
A comparison of two numerical methods - ¯nite di®erence and Adomian decomposition method (ADM) - to solve a variety of fractional partial dif- ferential equations that occur in ¯nance are investigated. These fractional partial di®erential equations fall into the class of L¶evy models. They are k...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
2010
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10539/7682 |
id |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-7682 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-76822019-05-11T03:42:06Z A comparison of numerical methods to solve fractional partial differential equations Marom, Ofir A comparison of two numerical methods - ¯nite di®erence and Adomian decomposition method (ADM) - to solve a variety of fractional partial dif- ferential equations that occur in ¯nance are investigated. These fractional partial di®erential equations fall into the class of L¶evy models. They are known as the Finite Moment Log Stable (FMLS), CGMY and the extended Koponen (KoBol) models. Convergence criteria for these models under the numerical methods are studied. ADM fails to accurately price a claim writ- ten on these models. However, the ¯nite di®erence scheme works well for the FMLS and KoBol models. 2010-03-15T11:44:26Z 2010-03-15T11:44:26Z 2010-03-15T11:44:26Z Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10539/7682 en application/pdf |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
A comparison of two numerical methods - ¯nite di®erence and Adomian
decomposition method (ADM) - to solve a variety of fractional partial dif-
ferential equations that occur in ¯nance are investigated. These fractional
partial di®erential equations fall into the class of L¶evy models. They are
known as the Finite Moment Log Stable (FMLS), CGMY and the extended
Koponen (KoBol) models. Convergence criteria for these models under the
numerical methods are studied. ADM fails to accurately price a claim writ-
ten on these models. However, the ¯nite di®erence scheme works well for the
FMLS and KoBol models. |
author |
Marom, Ofir |
spellingShingle |
Marom, Ofir A comparison of numerical methods to solve fractional partial differential equations |
author_facet |
Marom, Ofir |
author_sort |
Marom, Ofir |
title |
A comparison of numerical methods to solve fractional partial differential equations |
title_short |
A comparison of numerical methods to solve fractional partial differential equations |
title_full |
A comparison of numerical methods to solve fractional partial differential equations |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of numerical methods to solve fractional partial differential equations |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of numerical methods to solve fractional partial differential equations |
title_sort |
comparison of numerical methods to solve fractional partial differential equations |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10539/7682 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maromofir acomparisonofnumericalmethodstosolvefractionalpartialdifferentialequations AT maromofir comparisonofnumericalmethodstosolvefractionalpartialdifferentialequations |
_version_ |
1719085237414133760 |