Barriers to protection: gender-related persecution and asylum in South Africa

Abstract In 1998, South Africa became the first country to explicitly state within its refugee law that genderrelated persecution is a binding basis for asylum, further distinguishing South Africa as a state with outstanding legal commitments to gender equality. Creating further visibility within...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Middleton, Julie
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10539/7344
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-7344
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-73442019-05-11T03:41:54Z Barriers to protection: gender-related persecution and asylum in South Africa Middleton, Julie Abstract In 1998, South Africa became the first country to explicitly state within its refugee law that genderrelated persecution is a binding basis for asylum, further distinguishing South Africa as a state with outstanding legal commitments to gender equality. Creating further visibility within the law, however, is only one step in the process. How the law is implemented determines its real worth and effectiveness. This study assesses the manner in which asylum decisions are made, particularly in cases of gendered harm, questioning readily accepted and essentialised notions of women and gender. It looks at how the South African asylum system defines legitimate refugees, and the interplay of fluid interpretations of gender, culture, violence and the political within these constructions. Through interviews with officials and asylum seekers, the study identifies trends in the refugee system, and interrogates the reliance on narrow understandings of the political and personal, as well as the nature of conflict and culture. 2009-10-12T12:24:42Z 2009-10-12T12:24:42Z 2009-10-12T12:24:42Z Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10539/7344 en application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
description Abstract In 1998, South Africa became the first country to explicitly state within its refugee law that genderrelated persecution is a binding basis for asylum, further distinguishing South Africa as a state with outstanding legal commitments to gender equality. Creating further visibility within the law, however, is only one step in the process. How the law is implemented determines its real worth and effectiveness. This study assesses the manner in which asylum decisions are made, particularly in cases of gendered harm, questioning readily accepted and essentialised notions of women and gender. It looks at how the South African asylum system defines legitimate refugees, and the interplay of fluid interpretations of gender, culture, violence and the political within these constructions. Through interviews with officials and asylum seekers, the study identifies trends in the refugee system, and interrogates the reliance on narrow understandings of the political and personal, as well as the nature of conflict and culture.
author Middleton, Julie
spellingShingle Middleton, Julie
Barriers to protection: gender-related persecution and asylum in South Africa
author_facet Middleton, Julie
author_sort Middleton, Julie
title Barriers to protection: gender-related persecution and asylum in South Africa
title_short Barriers to protection: gender-related persecution and asylum in South Africa
title_full Barriers to protection: gender-related persecution and asylum in South Africa
title_fullStr Barriers to protection: gender-related persecution and asylum in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to protection: gender-related persecution and asylum in South Africa
title_sort barriers to protection: gender-related persecution and asylum in south africa
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10539/7344
work_keys_str_mv AT middletonjulie barrierstoprotectiongenderrelatedpersecutionandasyluminsouthafrica
_version_ 1719084906244472832