Determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy and its regression in people of African ancestry in South Africa

• Main Author: Libhaber, Elena Neustadt
• Format: Others
• Language: en
• Published: 2008
• Subjects: left ventricular hypertrophy; African ancestry
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10539/5022

ABSTRACT There is substantial evidence to suggest that independent of conventional BP, LV mass (LVM) is higher in African-Americans than in European-Americans a difference that may translate into a higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases. In the present thesis I assessed whether LVM is similarly elevated in groups of African descent living in Africa, and subsequently whether 24-hour, day or night BP or indices of arterial stiffness could explain the variability in LVM beyond conventional BP in this population group. As there is considerable controversy as to whether 24-hour BP measurements are better predictors of the regression of LVH than conventional BP and whether antihypertensive agents that target the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) regress LV hypertrophy (LVH) independent of BP in groups of African descent, in the present thesis I therefore also assessed these questions. In 141 healthy adult participants obtained from a random sample of nuclear families (n=399) of African ancestry living in Soweto, I determined that LVM adjusted for body surface area to the first power was an appropriate allometric signal to account for growth effects on LVM. The allometric signals established in other populations considerably over-adjusted for LVM in the group that I studied with marked negative relations noted. After adjusting for body surface area I noted upper thresholds of LVM index (LVMI) of 134 g/m2 for men and 112 g/m2 for women. As compared to thresholds described for other population samples these thresholds were noted to be modestly higher. In 187 women from randomly recruited nuclear families of African ancestry, after appropriate adjustments, conventional BP was as closely associated with LVMI as 24- hour BP, and daytime BP was as closely associated with LVMI as night-time BP in women. However, in 110 men from randomly recruited nuclear families of African ancestry, after appropriate adjustments, only night-time BP was associated with LVMI, an effect that was independent of conventional BP (r=0.21, p<0.05). Indices of nocturnal decreases in BP were not associated with LVMI in either gender group. Furthermore, in randomly recruited nuclear families of African ancestry, after appropriate adjustments, including systolic BP or pulse pressure, pulse wave velocity (an index of arterial stiffness assessed using applanation tonometry) was independently associated with LVMI in women (n=204, r=0.25, p<0.0005), but not in men (n=123, r=-0.07). In 173 hypertensive patients of African descent of whom 64 were previously untreated and 109 were previously treated, I assessed whether ambulatory BP is a better predictor of on-treatment decreases in LVMI over a 4 month treatment period. In the previously untreated patients, the regression in LVMI correlated to a similar degree (p<0.09) with decreases in conventional (r=0.34; p<0.005) and 24-hour (r=0.26; p<0.04) systolic BP. In this same study sample followed prospectively for 25 months, accounting for effects on ambulatory BP at each time point, the use of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril, was not associated with LVMI, whereas, on-treatment conventional systolic BP (p=0.01) and night-time systolic BP (p=0.01) were associated with LVMI. In a further study conducted in 87 patients of African ancestry with hypertension and LVH, I showed that changes in systolic ambulatory BP (daytime, r=0.46, p=0.006) were predictive of changes in LVMI after 2 months of treatment with an angiotensin II receptor blocker (candesartan), ACE-I (ramipril) and the diuretic agent, hydrochlorothiazide. Moreover, in a final study I showed that in hypertensive patients of African ancestry, initiating therapy with the diuretic, indapamide SR and then adding the ACE-I, perindopril 4 mg (n=42), was equally as effective as amlodipine (calcium channel blocker) (n=44) therapy at reducing ambulatory BP and LVMI. Thus, in conclusion, groups of African descent living in Africa have only marginally higher thresholds for LVM than other population groups. Moreover, in this population group, nocturnal BP has a conventional BP-independent effect on LVMI in men, but not in women, whereas arterial stiffness has a conventional BP-independent effect on LVMI in women, but not in men. Further, in this population, reductions in LVM produced by antihypertensive therapy appear to be equally as closely related to conventional as ambulatory BP and in contrast to findings in groups of European ancestry, where RAS blockers produce unique benefits on LVM beyond conventional BP reductions, in groups of African ancestry in Africa, RAS blockers produce no BPindependent reductions in LVM. Moreover, in this population, decreases in LVM in patients with LVH produced by RAS blockers are related to ambulatory BP changes and despite the ineffectiveness of RAS blockers on BP when used as monotherapy in this population, RAS blockers together with diuretics are equally as effective in decreasing BP and LVM as compared to a class of antihypertensive agents with established efficacy (calcium channel blockers). Hence when compelling indications for RAS blockade exist, RAS blocker-diuretic combinations are effective therapy in patients of African descent living in Africa.