| Summary: | Purpose: The purpose of this work was to compare and analyse two clinically
measurable beam quality specifiers, the half value layer (HVL) and the ratio of the
doses at depths 2 cm and 5 cm (D2/D5) for a range of kilovoltage modalities, and to
determine whether a practical, alternative and/or better correlation exists.
Methods and materials: Four x-ray units were used: two Philips RT 250 units, a
Pantak HF 420 operated up to 250 kV, and a D3300 Gulmay Medical unit operated up
to 300 kV. As not all these units were equipped with an internal monitor chamber, a
system was used where either the first measurement was repeated at the end of each
series or an external monitor chamber was employed in order to ensure output
constancy. A range of HVL’s were measured on each of the energies investigated on
this work, which were used clinically. A calibrated 0.6 cc ionization chamber was
used in a 30 cm x 30 cm x 30 cm water phantom to measure the absorbed dose to
water at depths 2 cm and 5 cm in order to investigate D2/D5 as the alternative quality
index.
Results: The effectiveness of using a monitor chamber in the determination of HVL
has been shown to be significant in this work where HVLs differed by up to 3%.
Errors incurred from using HVL have been identified. This work verified that the ratio
of doses at depths 2 cm and 5 cm in water could be applied as a kilovoltage beam
quality specifier in the clinical environment at low and medium energies with a well
defined FSD and field size.
Conclusions: The use of D2/D5 as a tool to verify the beam quality index would
simplify quality control in the clinical environment. Further work would have to be
done to investigate other energies. Lower energies may require the use of shallower
depths in order to improve accuracy and ensure a more clinically relevant setup.
|
|---|
