Morality and journalists: objectivity versus duty of care

A research report submitted to the Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, Applied Ethics for Professionals, 2018 === In this research report I address the question: Do journalists have a mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leshilo, Thabo
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 2019
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10539/26530
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-26530
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-265302019-05-11T03:40:46Z Morality and journalists: objectivity versus duty of care Leshilo, Thabo A research report submitted to the Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, Applied Ethics for Professionals, 2018 In this research report I address the question: Do journalists have a moral duty towards those they report on beyond the objectivity requirement of their job? I use the famous example of freelance photojournalist Kevin Carter and his iconic photograph of a starving Sudanese child, seemingly on death’s door and being stalked by a vulture. He was roundly condemned for shooting the image but doing nothing to save the child’s life. I examine this classic example of the observance of the journalistic standard of objectivity and non-intervention, against the Kantian imperative to respect human life. I contrast this with two examples in which, in my view, journalists acted correctly in terms of Kantian ethics by putting human life above their own, narrow professional roles and interests. XL2019 2019-03-07T14:12:48Z 2019-03-07T14:12:48Z 2018 Thesis https://hdl.handle.net/10539/26530 en application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
description A research report submitted to the Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, Applied Ethics for Professionals, 2018 === In this research report I address the question: Do journalists have a moral duty towards those they report on beyond the objectivity requirement of their job? I use the famous example of freelance photojournalist Kevin Carter and his iconic photograph of a starving Sudanese child, seemingly on death’s door and being stalked by a vulture. He was roundly condemned for shooting the image but doing nothing to save the child’s life. I examine this classic example of the observance of the journalistic standard of objectivity and non-intervention, against the Kantian imperative to respect human life. I contrast this with two examples in which, in my view, journalists acted correctly in terms of Kantian ethics by putting human life above their own, narrow professional roles and interests. === XL2019
author Leshilo, Thabo
spellingShingle Leshilo, Thabo
Morality and journalists: objectivity versus duty of care
author_facet Leshilo, Thabo
author_sort Leshilo, Thabo
title Morality and journalists: objectivity versus duty of care
title_short Morality and journalists: objectivity versus duty of care
title_full Morality and journalists: objectivity versus duty of care
title_fullStr Morality and journalists: objectivity versus duty of care
title_full_unstemmed Morality and journalists: objectivity versus duty of care
title_sort morality and journalists: objectivity versus duty of care
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/10539/26530
work_keys_str_mv AT leshilothabo moralityandjournalistsobjectivityversusdutyofcare
_version_ 1719082409952018432