The ethics of antibiotics use in animal farming

A Research report submitted to the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Medicine Bioethics and Health Law. Johannesburg, 2017 === The unnecessary use of antimicrobials poses a gl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ncayiyana, Philisiwe Precious
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 2018
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10539/25811
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-25811
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-258112019-05-11T03:39:56Z The ethics of antibiotics use in animal farming Ncayiyana, Philisiwe Precious A Research report submitted to the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Medicine Bioethics and Health Law. Johannesburg, 2017 The unnecessary use of antimicrobials poses a global threat to human health by contributing to the Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) development. This report evaluates the ethical and scientific implications of non-therapeutic use of antibiotics in animal farming. The report also critiques O'Neill's (2016) Final Report on AMR. The report provides a normative assessment and analysis of scientific evidence and ethical issues involved in farming with antibiotics making use of Mepham's Ethical Matrix. The report makes the case that non-therapeutic use of antibiotics in animal farming contributes to AMR development and that it is not ethically justifiable for farmers to carry on farming with antibiotics non-therapeutically. The study also argues that intensive factory farming poses the greatest risk in the preservation of all classes of antibiotics because it is customary to use antibiotics where a large number of animals are kept in close proximity for example, in poultry farming. An immediate ban of antibiotics deemed medically important for humans in animal farming is necessary in order to prevent the spread of antibiotic resistance. This however, must go hand in hand with preparation for abandonment of intensive farming systems in order for a ban to be successful. The study also recommends the adoption of O'Neill's (2016) recommendations on tackling AMR. In addition, a national public awareness campaign is justified by the threat posed by AMR. Governments and other relevant stakeholders involved should formulate policies or frameworks to deal with the problem with the urgency it requires MT 2018 2018-10-16T09:35:27Z 2018-10-16T09:35:27Z 2017 Thesis https://hdl.handle.net/10539/25811 en application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
description A Research report submitted to the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Medicine Bioethics and Health Law. Johannesburg, 2017 === The unnecessary use of antimicrobials poses a global threat to human health by contributing to the Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) development. This report evaluates the ethical and scientific implications of non-therapeutic use of antibiotics in animal farming. The report also critiques O'Neill's (2016) Final Report on AMR. The report provides a normative assessment and analysis of scientific evidence and ethical issues involved in farming with antibiotics making use of Mepham's Ethical Matrix. The report makes the case that non-therapeutic use of antibiotics in animal farming contributes to AMR development and that it is not ethically justifiable for farmers to carry on farming with antibiotics non-therapeutically. The study also argues that intensive factory farming poses the greatest risk in the preservation of all classes of antibiotics because it is customary to use antibiotics where a large number of animals are kept in close proximity for example, in poultry farming. An immediate ban of antibiotics deemed medically important for humans in animal farming is necessary in order to prevent the spread of antibiotic resistance. This however, must go hand in hand with preparation for abandonment of intensive farming systems in order for a ban to be successful. The study also recommends the adoption of O'Neill's (2016) recommendations on tackling AMR. In addition, a national public awareness campaign is justified by the threat posed by AMR. Governments and other relevant stakeholders involved should formulate policies or frameworks to deal with the problem with the urgency it requires === MT 2018
author Ncayiyana, Philisiwe Precious
spellingShingle Ncayiyana, Philisiwe Precious
The ethics of antibiotics use in animal farming
author_facet Ncayiyana, Philisiwe Precious
author_sort Ncayiyana, Philisiwe Precious
title The ethics of antibiotics use in animal farming
title_short The ethics of antibiotics use in animal farming
title_full The ethics of antibiotics use in animal farming
title_fullStr The ethics of antibiotics use in animal farming
title_full_unstemmed The ethics of antibiotics use in animal farming
title_sort ethics of antibiotics use in animal farming
publishDate 2018
url https://hdl.handle.net/10539/25811
work_keys_str_mv AT ncayiyanaphilisiweprecious theethicsofantibioticsuseinanimalfarming
AT ncayiyanaphilisiweprecious ethicsofantibioticsuseinanimalfarming
_version_ 1719080782099644416