Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of permanent maxillary first molars cone beam computed tomography in a sample of patients treated at the Wits oral health centre

Methods: Two hundred CBCT images with bilateral permanent maxillary first molar were carefully examined by two dentists. Information obtained was on the number and morphology of roots per tooth, the number of canals per root, the root canal configuration in each root using Vertucci’s classification,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Irhaim, Abdelmenem Ali
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10539/23182
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-23182
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-231822019-05-11T03:41:41Z Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of permanent maxillary first molars cone beam computed tomography in a sample of patients treated at the Wits oral health centre Irhaim, Abdelmenem Ali Methods: Two hundred CBCT images with bilateral permanent maxillary first molar were carefully examined by two dentists. Information obtained was on the number and morphology of roots per tooth, the number of canals per root, the root canal configuration in each root using Vertucci’s classification, the relationship between MB2, tooth position and different age groups, and the frequency of C-shaped root canals were determined. Results: The prevalence of three separate roots was 91%. The frequency of three roots where two of them were fused was 8%. Two fused roots were observed in 0.5% of teeth and three fused roots were seen in 0.5% teeth. Regarding the mesiobuccal roots (MBR), the most frequent was Vertucci type IV root canal configuration (42.75%), then type I ( 39.5%),Type II (15%), type III (1.25%); type V (0.75%), and type VI (0, 75%). The occurrence of bilateral MB2 was 65, 75% while the unilateral occurrence of MB2 was 34, 24%.There was no significant difference between 5 age groups (p=0.759, and tooth position p=9977 in regard of presence of MB2. (Distobuccal roots (DBR) displayed a type I configuration in 99.5% of teeth, with only 0.5% of teeth displaying a type IV canal configuration. All palatal roots (PR) had type I canal configuration. No C shaped canals were observed in the sample of 400 permanent maxillary first molars teeth. Conclusion: Cone-beam computed tomography provides valuable information about the anatomy of root and canal morphology which may facilitate root canal therapy. MT2017 2017-09-28T12:49:52Z 2017-09-28T12:49:52Z 2016 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10539/23182 en application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
description Methods: Two hundred CBCT images with bilateral permanent maxillary first molar were carefully examined by two dentists. Information obtained was on the number and morphology of roots per tooth, the number of canals per root, the root canal configuration in each root using Vertucci’s classification, the relationship between MB2, tooth position and different age groups, and the frequency of C-shaped root canals were determined. Results: The prevalence of three separate roots was 91%. The frequency of three roots where two of them were fused was 8%. Two fused roots were observed in 0.5% of teeth and three fused roots were seen in 0.5% teeth. Regarding the mesiobuccal roots (MBR), the most frequent was Vertucci type IV root canal configuration (42.75%), then type I ( 39.5%),Type II (15%), type III (1.25%); type V (0.75%), and type VI (0, 75%). The occurrence of bilateral MB2 was 65, 75% while the unilateral occurrence of MB2 was 34, 24%.There was no significant difference between 5 age groups (p=0.759, and tooth position p=9977 in regard of presence of MB2. (Distobuccal roots (DBR) displayed a type I configuration in 99.5% of teeth, with only 0.5% of teeth displaying a type IV canal configuration. All palatal roots (PR) had type I canal configuration. No C shaped canals were observed in the sample of 400 permanent maxillary first molars teeth. Conclusion: Cone-beam computed tomography provides valuable information about the anatomy of root and canal morphology which may facilitate root canal therapy. === MT2017
author Irhaim, Abdelmenem Ali
spellingShingle Irhaim, Abdelmenem Ali
Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of permanent maxillary first molars cone beam computed tomography in a sample of patients treated at the Wits oral health centre
author_facet Irhaim, Abdelmenem Ali
author_sort Irhaim, Abdelmenem Ali
title Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of permanent maxillary first molars cone beam computed tomography in a sample of patients treated at the Wits oral health centre
title_short Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of permanent maxillary first molars cone beam computed tomography in a sample of patients treated at the Wits oral health centre
title_full Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of permanent maxillary first molars cone beam computed tomography in a sample of patients treated at the Wits oral health centre
title_fullStr Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of permanent maxillary first molars cone beam computed tomography in a sample of patients treated at the Wits oral health centre
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of permanent maxillary first molars cone beam computed tomography in a sample of patients treated at the Wits oral health centre
title_sort evaluation of the root and canal morphology of permanent maxillary first molars cone beam computed tomography in a sample of patients treated at the wits oral health centre
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/10539/23182
work_keys_str_mv AT irhaimabdelmenemali evaluationoftherootandcanalmorphologyofpermanentmaxillaryfirstmolarsconebeamcomputedtomographyinasampleofpatientstreatedatthewitsoralhealthcentre
_version_ 1719084398164312064