A comparative study of micro & nanocarbon reinforced synthetic rubber composites

• Main Author: Maifadi, James
• Format: Others
• Language: en
• Published: 2014
• Subjects: Nanostructured materials.; Carbon.; Rubber > Reinforcement.
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10539/15327

A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Johannesburg, 2014. === This study concentrated on two main thrusts: 1) the optimal synthesis and characterisation of various micro- and nanosized carbon materials and 2) a comparative investigation of the capabilities of these carbonaceous materials to reinforce a locally available styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), which was commonly used to make car tyres. In the former case, a range of carbon materials including nitrogen doped/undoped carbon nanotubes as well as carbon microspheres (CMSs) were successfully synthesized by two different techniques (i.e. chemical vapour deposition (CVD) and hydrothermal synthesis). These were then fully characterised by numerous techniques which included: TEM, TGA, FTIR, PXRD, laser Raman spectroscopy, Zeta potential measurements and BET surface area analysis. In the latter case, these micro and nanocarbon materials were systematically added to SBR at various loadings (ranging from 0.125–0.500% (m/m)). Here the tensile strengths of the resultant composites, loaded with these various micro and nanocarbon materials, were measured for comparison to establish which (if any) was the best reinforcement material for SBR. Results obtained from the tensile strength measurements of the variously loaded SBR composites, showed that irrespective of the method of synthesis (i.e. CVD or hydrothermal synthesis) carbon microspheres (undoped, doped, functionalised or unfuntionalised) performed more poorly as fillers than carbon nanotubes. Furthermore the results obtained, from the various characterisation techniques mentioned previously, indicated that the lower performance of these microspheres as fillers may have been due to their: size, shape and low surface areas. By contrast when the tensile strengths of SBR reinforced with either CNTs or NCNTs were measured, the former outperformed the latter as fillers. It was speculated, based upon the data obtained, that NCNTs were poorer fillers than CNTs due to their higher negative surface charges, larger diameters and lower crystallinity. Hence this study has shown that low loadings (i.e. 0.250 % (m/m)) of the correctly matched type of carbonaceous material can significantly enhance the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of a locally available styrene butadiene rubber.