Analysis of injection spray patterns for common rail system

The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the fuel spray characteristics of DME and diesel fuel being injected through a common-rail fuel injection system into a constant volume pressure vessel containing nitrogen gas. The fuel pressure and the chamber pressure were varied from 20...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alimia, Omid Iskander
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10539/10687
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-10687
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-106872019-05-11T03:41:32Z Analysis of injection spray patterns for common rail system Alimia, Omid Iskander The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the fuel spray characteristics of DME and diesel fuel being injected through a common-rail fuel injection system into a constant volume pressure vessel containing nitrogen gas. The fuel pressure and the chamber pressure were varied from 200-500bar and 1-10bar respectively, all at room temperature conditions. Images of the spray were captured at a rate of 7500fps utilizing a high speed camera, with a CMOS sensor, in conjunction with a schlieren optical system. The images were then analyzed to determine quantitative aspects of the spray such as spray penetration, cone angle and mean spray velocity and qualitative aspects like evaporation and flash boiling. The fuel line pressure was also recorded and analysed to determine the effect that injection had on the pressure in the line. For the same injection conditions it was found that the penetration of diesel was greater than that of DME and the cone angle of diesel was greater than that of DME except at atmospheric back pressure. The pressure oscillation in the DME fuel line was smaller in amplitude and longer in duration than that of diesel. The DME spray exhibited signs of flash boiling and evaporation when injected into an environment at atmospheric pressure and room temperature. As the chamber pressure was increased the DME spray shape became increasingly similar to that of the diesel spray shape. The spray boundaries, however, differed with DME exhibiting a more defined fuel-to-air barrier and diesel exhibiting a fine mist at its boundary. The predicted spray penetrations of DME, using existing correlations, were accurate for atmospheric back pressure conditions only. 2011-11-02T09:41:58Z 2011-11-02T09:41:58Z 2011-11-02 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10539/10687 en application/pdf application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
description The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the fuel spray characteristics of DME and diesel fuel being injected through a common-rail fuel injection system into a constant volume pressure vessel containing nitrogen gas. The fuel pressure and the chamber pressure were varied from 200-500bar and 1-10bar respectively, all at room temperature conditions. Images of the spray were captured at a rate of 7500fps utilizing a high speed camera, with a CMOS sensor, in conjunction with a schlieren optical system. The images were then analyzed to determine quantitative aspects of the spray such as spray penetration, cone angle and mean spray velocity and qualitative aspects like evaporation and flash boiling. The fuel line pressure was also recorded and analysed to determine the effect that injection had on the pressure in the line. For the same injection conditions it was found that the penetration of diesel was greater than that of DME and the cone angle of diesel was greater than that of DME except at atmospheric back pressure. The pressure oscillation in the DME fuel line was smaller in amplitude and longer in duration than that of diesel. The DME spray exhibited signs of flash boiling and evaporation when injected into an environment at atmospheric pressure and room temperature. As the chamber pressure was increased the DME spray shape became increasingly similar to that of the diesel spray shape. The spray boundaries, however, differed with DME exhibiting a more defined fuel-to-air barrier and diesel exhibiting a fine mist at its boundary. The predicted spray penetrations of DME, using existing correlations, were accurate for atmospheric back pressure conditions only.
author Alimia, Omid Iskander
spellingShingle Alimia, Omid Iskander
Analysis of injection spray patterns for common rail system
author_facet Alimia, Omid Iskander
author_sort Alimia, Omid Iskander
title Analysis of injection spray patterns for common rail system
title_short Analysis of injection spray patterns for common rail system
title_full Analysis of injection spray patterns for common rail system
title_fullStr Analysis of injection spray patterns for common rail system
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of injection spray patterns for common rail system
title_sort analysis of injection spray patterns for common rail system
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/10539/10687
work_keys_str_mv AT alimiaomidiskander analysisofinjectionspraypatternsforcommonrailsystem
_version_ 1719083727309504512