Evaluating the role of learning support materials in curriculum implementation: the case of "WE CARE"
A mini dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Education in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Environmental Education In the Mathematics, Science & Technology Education Department at the University of Zululand, South Africa, 2008. === The study sought to explo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10530/969 |
id |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uzulu-oai-uzspace.unizulu.ac.za-10530-969 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uzulu-oai-uzspace.unizulu.ac.za-10530-9692020-12-09T05:19:59Z Evaluating the role of learning support materials in curriculum implementation: the case of "WE CARE" Luthuli, Cleopatra Dlamini, E.T. Learning support materials A mini dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Education in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Environmental Education In the Mathematics, Science & Technology Education Department at the University of Zululand, South Africa, 2008. The study sought to explore the impact that exemplary curriculum materials called "We Care" had made on the classroom practice of the recipients, namely educators in rural areas. It also explored the ways in which the recipients put the materials to use. The materials in question introduced the educators to the practice of integrating Environmental Education (EE) into the teaching of the Natural Sciences. The materials also provided suggestions with regard to learner-centred actrvrty-based ideas for learning programme development Teaching experiences of educators using "We Care" were recorded mainly by means of videotaped lessons, which were transcribed and analyzed. Results showed that all the educators found the materials informative and interesting to use. "We Care" materials generated collegiality among the educators and inspired them to work together and share ideas. Analysis of the videotaped lessons, however, revealed that the participants often lacked adequate content to explain science concepts clearly. Group work was also handled poorly, with the result that the objectives of group activities were not being achieved. A general weakness in handling the outcomes-based approach was evident, despite the participants' expressed conviction that "We Care" had helped them to demystify OBE. The study's value manifested in the identification of good practice among the participants and in the opportunity that it provided to discuss exemplary practice. 2011-12-12T09:56:08Z 2011-12-12T09:56:08Z 2008 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10530/969 en application/pdf |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Learning support materials |
spellingShingle |
Learning support materials Luthuli, Cleopatra Evaluating the role of learning support materials in curriculum implementation: the case of "WE CARE" |
description |
A mini dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Education in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Environmental Education In the
Mathematics, Science & Technology Education Department
at the University of Zululand, South Africa, 2008. === The study sought to explore the impact that exemplary curriculum materials called "We Care" had made on the classroom practice of the recipients, namely educators in rural areas. It also explored the ways in which the recipients put the materials to use.
The materials in question introduced the educators to the practice of integrating Environmental Education (EE) into the teaching of the Natural Sciences. The materials also provided suggestions with regard to learner-centred actrvrty-based ideas for learning programme development Teaching experiences of educators using "We Care" were recorded mainly by means of videotaped lessons, which were transcribed and analyzed.
Results showed that all the educators found the materials informative and interesting to use. "We Care" materials generated collegiality among the educators and inspired them to work together and share ideas. Analysis of the videotaped lessons, however, revealed that the participants often lacked adequate content to explain science concepts clearly.
Group work was also handled poorly, with the result that the objectives of group activities were not being achieved. A general weakness in handling the outcomes-based approach was evident, despite the participants' expressed conviction that "We Care" had helped them to demystify OBE. The study's value manifested in the identification of good practice among the participants and in the opportunity that it provided to discuss exemplary practice. |
author2 |
Dlamini, E.T. |
author_facet |
Dlamini, E.T. Luthuli, Cleopatra |
author |
Luthuli, Cleopatra |
author_sort |
Luthuli, Cleopatra |
title |
Evaluating the role of learning support materials in curriculum implementation: the case of "WE CARE" |
title_short |
Evaluating the role of learning support materials in curriculum implementation: the case of "WE CARE" |
title_full |
Evaluating the role of learning support materials in curriculum implementation: the case of "WE CARE" |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating the role of learning support materials in curriculum implementation: the case of "WE CARE" |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating the role of learning support materials in curriculum implementation: the case of "WE CARE" |
title_sort |
evaluating the role of learning support materials in curriculum implementation: the case of "we care" |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10530/969 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT luthulicleopatra evaluatingtheroleoflearningsupportmaterialsincurriculumimplementationthecaseofwecare |
_version_ |
1719369020472295424 |