Discretion among street level bureaucrats: A case study of nurses in a public hospital in Cape Town

Masters in Public Administration - MPA === There are often noted gaps and tensions arise between official government policies and what is implemented on the ground. The two theories that consistently argue antagonistically about the policy processes are the rational bureaucratic model also called...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dzambo, Timalizge
Other Authors: Ruiters, Greg
Language:en
Published: University of the Western Cape 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11394/8225
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uwc-oai-etd.uwc.ac.za-11394-8225
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uwc-oai-etd.uwc.ac.za-11394-82252021-04-24T05:21:51Z Discretion among street level bureaucrats: A case study of nurses in a public hospital in Cape Town Dzambo, Timalizge Ruiters, Greg Bureaucratic Street level bureaucracy (SLB) Discretion Implementation Antagonistically Public hospital Cape Town Monitoring Masters in Public Administration - MPA There are often noted gaps and tensions arise between official government policies and what is implemented on the ground. The two theories that consistently argue antagonistically about the policy processes are the rational bureaucratic model also called the "top-down approach" as opposed to the incremental or bottom-up approach. This research was inspired by a bottom-up perspective and involves a detailed investigation of Lipsky's street level bureaucracy (SLB) theory. Over the years since Lipsky's research much international work has be done on the subject of discretion among policy implementers but in the South the focus has been more on top-down ideas such as increasing state capacity and monitoring workers and not on the Lipsky problematic. Hence, this study specifically focuses on studying the extent, intentions and uses of discretion. Intentions are look e at in a threefold manner: good, bad and conflicting, among nurses as SLBs in a public hospital in Cape Town, in view of the t wo conflicting approaches to policy implementation. I found that the discretion practices among nurses do 'more good than harm' as opposed to the view held by the top down approach. The study further revealed that discretion is also often conflicted or ambivalent. Moreover, it is often based on tacit collective understandings and practices among groups of nurses. This is one element that needs to be explored further in future studies in order to contribute to the body of knowledge. Notably, there appears to be a gap in South African literature on this vital subject area. 111 2021-04-22T10:44:44Z 2021-04-22T10:44:44Z 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/11394/8225 en University of the Western Cape University of the Western Cape
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Bureaucratic
Street level bureaucracy (SLB)
Discretion
Implementation
Antagonistically
Public hospital
Cape Town
Monitoring
spellingShingle Bureaucratic
Street level bureaucracy (SLB)
Discretion
Implementation
Antagonistically
Public hospital
Cape Town
Monitoring
Dzambo, Timalizge
Discretion among street level bureaucrats: A case study of nurses in a public hospital in Cape Town
description Masters in Public Administration - MPA === There are often noted gaps and tensions arise between official government policies and what is implemented on the ground. The two theories that consistently argue antagonistically about the policy processes are the rational bureaucratic model also called the "top-down approach" as opposed to the incremental or bottom-up approach. This research was inspired by a bottom-up perspective and involves a detailed investigation of Lipsky's street level bureaucracy (SLB) theory. Over the years since Lipsky's research much international work has be done on the subject of discretion among policy implementers but in the South the focus has been more on top-down ideas such as increasing state capacity and monitoring workers and not on the Lipsky problematic. Hence, this study specifically focuses on studying the extent, intentions and uses of discretion. Intentions are look e at in a threefold manner: good, bad and conflicting, among nurses as SLBs in a public hospital in Cape Town, in view of the t wo conflicting approaches to policy implementation. I found that the discretion practices among nurses do 'more good than harm' as opposed to the view held by the top down approach. The study further revealed that discretion is also often conflicted or ambivalent. Moreover, it is often based on tacit collective understandings and practices among groups of nurses. This is one element that needs to be explored further in future studies in order to contribute to the body of knowledge. Notably, there appears to be a gap in South African literature on this vital subject area. 111
author2 Ruiters, Greg
author_facet Ruiters, Greg
Dzambo, Timalizge
author Dzambo, Timalizge
author_sort Dzambo, Timalizge
title Discretion among street level bureaucrats: A case study of nurses in a public hospital in Cape Town
title_short Discretion among street level bureaucrats: A case study of nurses in a public hospital in Cape Town
title_full Discretion among street level bureaucrats: A case study of nurses in a public hospital in Cape Town
title_fullStr Discretion among street level bureaucrats: A case study of nurses in a public hospital in Cape Town
title_full_unstemmed Discretion among street level bureaucrats: A case study of nurses in a public hospital in Cape Town
title_sort discretion among street level bureaucrats: a case study of nurses in a public hospital in cape town
publisher University of the Western Cape
publishDate 2021
url http://hdl.handle.net/11394/8225
work_keys_str_mv AT dzambotimalizge discretionamongstreetlevelbureaucratsacasestudyofnursesinapublichospitalincapetown
_version_ 1719398443118493696