The interactions between biotic and abiotic factors that influence the sustainability of tomato production in South Africa
Tomato production was an important economic activity in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. A clear tomato yield gap existed between South Africa and the other countries in Southern Africa. Understanding the reasons behind tomato crop failures and successes in South Africa could increase tomato...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en |
Published: |
University of Pretoria
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/57255 Malherbe, S 2016, The interactions between biotic and abiotic factors that influence the sustainability of tomato production in South Africa, PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/57255> |
Summary: | Tomato production was an important economic activity in the Limpopo Province of South
Africa. A clear tomato yield gap existed between South Africa and the other countries in
Southern Africa. Understanding the reasons behind tomato crop failures and successes in South
Africa could increase tomato production in the fast-growing tomato markets of Angola,
Mozambique and Zimbabwe, thereby improving food and nutrition security for smallholders
and the population in general. In this study, the i) economics of tomato production in South
Africa was investigated and compared to similar production systems in the USA, Turkey and
India, ii) the interactions between biotic and abiotic factors that limited tomato yield and quality
within three climatically distinct planting windows in the Limpopo Province of South Africa
were examined, and iii) the correlations between three commercially available soil health
metrics (i.e., a microscope-based method for estimating the biomass of soil bacteria, fungi and
protozoans; nematode community profiling based on counts and trophic group classifications
and related indices; polyphasic soil health testing based on soil biological, physical and
chemical variables) and tomato yield were assessed. Meta-analysis was used to explore yield
variation in open field production systems in the international context. The main yield-limiting
factors were identified as planting times, planting density, soil-water relations, and
synthetic/organic nitrogen fertilization. The focus of the study shifted to commercial tomato
production in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. Since 2003, these tomato producers
practiced intensive open field tomato production using a combination of synthetic and organic
soil, crop and pest management technologies. A review of tomato production economics
revealed that within a period of six years, South African tomato production cost per hectare
more than doubled but the profit margin halved. The importance of tomato quality as an
economic factor was demonstrated. Economic pressures forced these tomato producers to
intensify production, which underscored the need for the continued development of sustainable
tomato production systems. To achieve this strategic goal, the primary biotic and abiotic factors
that limited tomato production were identified. The results indicated that complex interactions
between biotic and abiotic factors explained yield and quality variation. Climate variation
dominated crop productivity, especially in unsuitable planting windows. Soil and crop
management variables, notably synthetic fertilizer and pesticide usage, ensured high quality
yield. Soil biology management was an important aspect of sustainable agriculture and the use
of appropriate soil biology metrics facilitated soil biology management at field scale. All three
soil biology metrics were sensitive to distinguish between three types of disturbed soils commonly encountered in the open field tomato production context: natural, disturbed and
cultivated soils. The microscope-based method used for quantifying bacterial, fungal and
protozoan biomass and numbers was unsuitable for explaining yield variation. Nematode
community profiling, in conjunction with polyphasic soil health testing, was very useful for
explaining yield variation. In particular, soil pH, boron, aggregate stability, Paratrichodorus
spp. and the balance among soil cations (especially exchangeable K and Mg) explained yield
variation. In conclusion, sustainable open field tomato production depends on the integrated
use of synthetic and organic crop nutrition and protection technologies, optimum planting
times, disease-resistant genetic material, and cultivation on healthy soils. The findings of this
study will benefit policy development in support of sustainable vegetable production in the
rural areas of Southern Africa. === Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2016. === tm2016 === Plant Production and Soil Science === PhD === Unrestricted |
---|