Applying a positive deviance approach to determine when rationally bounded borrowers derive benefit from consumer loans
The question about how consumer lending benefits or harms society is unresolved. Significant strides have been made in terms of developing a rigorous methodology for assessing the benefits of microcredit using randomised control trials. This approach rules out the shortcomings of selection bias i...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
University of Pretoria
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/52386 Fraser, F 2015,Applying a positive deviance approach to determine when rationally bounded borrowers derive benefit from consumer loans, MBA Mini-dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/52386> |
| Summary: | The question about how consumer lending benefits or harms society is unresolved.
Significant strides have been made in terms of developing a rigorous methodology for
assessing the benefits of microcredit using randomised control trials. This approach
rules out the shortcomings of selection bias in earlier work. However, studies to date
appear prone to anchoring bias associated with the intention of microfinance to
eradicate poverty.
In South Africa, the volatile socio-economic conditions (slow economic growth, high
unemployment levels, heightened levels of labour unrest and high levels of inequality)
emphasise the business need for studying the consumer lending market. Financial
inclusion could play the role of aiding or harming South Africa s society.
This research aimed to determine in what conditions rationally bounded borrowers find
loans beneficial using an inductive approach. A two-phased research process was
followed firstly, ten semi-structured interviews were conducted with a diverse group of
key informants from government, industry, the media and regulators. Secondly, ten
borrowers were interviewed and observed drawing on ethnographic research methods.
Most of the interviews took place in the home of the respondent and where possible the
researcher met the other members of the household. The sample of borrowers were
potential positive deviants individuals that derive more benefit from consumer loans
than their peers.
The research uncovered sustained tension and ideological differences between
stakeholders that results in incoherent policy and regulation and inadequate financial
inclusion. The landscape is characterised by low levels of savings and a heavy reliance
on loans. Borrowers in the sample were selected to participate in the research due to
repeat borrowing patterns, yet many expressed a desire to stop or reduce borrowing.
This saying-doing gap suggests that a structural and coordinated plan is needed if any
behaviour change is likely amongst rationally bounded borrowers. A combination of
restrictive regulation and positive incentives is proposed to encourage stakeholders to
develop mutually beneficial strategies for achieving financial inclusion. The ability of
stakeholders to develop coherence in this landscape will determine whether financial
inclusion will make a positive contribution to South African society. === Mini Dissertation (MBA)--University of Pretoria, 2015. === sn2016 === Gordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS) === MBA === Unrestricted |
|---|