The performance of the preliminary test estimator under different loss functions

In this thesis different situations are considered in which the preliminary test estimator is applied and the performance of the preliminary test estimator under different proposed loss functions, namely the reflected normal , linear exponential (LINEX) and bounded LINEX (BLINEX) loss functions is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kleyn, Judith
Other Authors: Arashi, Mohammad
Language:en
Published: University of Pretoria 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43132
Kleyn, J 2014, The performance of the preliminary test estimator under different loss functions, PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43132>
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-up-oai-repository.up.ac.za-2263-43132
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-up-oai-repository.up.ac.za-2263-431322021-03-05T05:11:26Z The performance of the preliminary test estimator under different loss functions Kleyn, Judith Arashi, Mohammad Bekker, Andriette, 1958- Block bootstrapping Bounded LINEX loss function Feasible Bayes estimator LINEX loss function Preliminary test estimator UCTD In this thesis different situations are considered in which the preliminary test estimator is applied and the performance of the preliminary test estimator under different proposed loss functions, namely the reflected normal , linear exponential (LINEX) and bounded LINEX (BLINEX) loss functions is evaluated. In order to motivate the use of the BLINEX loss function rather than the reflected normal loss or the LINEX loss function, the risk for the preliminary test estimator and its component estimators derived under BLINEX loss is compared to the risk of the preliminary test estimator and its components estimators derived under both reflected normal loss and LINEX loss analytically (in some sections) and computationally. It is shown that both the risk under reflected normal loss and the risk under LINEX loss is higher than the risk under BLINEX loss. The key focus point under consideration is the estimation of the regression coefficients of a multiple regression model under two conditions, namely the presence of multicollinearity and linear restrictions imposed on the regression coefficients. In order to address the multicollinearity problem, the regression coefficients were adjusted by making use of Hoerl and Kennard’s (1970) approach in ridge regression. Furthermore, in situations where under- or overestimation exist, symmetric loss functions will not give optimal results and it was necessary to consider asymmetric loss functions. In the economic application, it was shown that a loss function which is both asymmetric and bounded to ensure a maximum upper bound for the loss, is the most appropriate function to use. In order to evaluate the effect that different ridge parameters have on the estimation, the risk values were calculated for all three ridge regression estimators under different conditions, namely an increase in variance, an increase in the level of multicollinearity, an increase in the number of parameters to be estimated in the regression model and an increase in the sample size. These results were compared to each other and summarised for all the proposed estimators and proposed loss functions. The comparison of the three proposed ridge regression estimators under all the proposed loss functions was also summarised for an increase in the sample size and an increase in variance. Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2014. lk2014 Statistics PhD Unrestricted 2015-01-19T12:11:02Z 2015-01-19T12:11:02Z 2014/12/12 2014 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43132 Kleyn, J 2014, The performance of the preliminary test estimator under different loss functions, PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43132> D14/9/27 2477645 en © 2014 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. University of Pretoria
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Block bootstrapping
Bounded LINEX loss function
Feasible Bayes estimator
LINEX loss function
Preliminary test estimator
UCTD
spellingShingle Block bootstrapping
Bounded LINEX loss function
Feasible Bayes estimator
LINEX loss function
Preliminary test estimator
UCTD
Kleyn, Judith
The performance of the preliminary test estimator under different loss functions
description In this thesis different situations are considered in which the preliminary test estimator is applied and the performance of the preliminary test estimator under different proposed loss functions, namely the reflected normal , linear exponential (LINEX) and bounded LINEX (BLINEX) loss functions is evaluated. In order to motivate the use of the BLINEX loss function rather than the reflected normal loss or the LINEX loss function, the risk for the preliminary test estimator and its component estimators derived under BLINEX loss is compared to the risk of the preliminary test estimator and its components estimators derived under both reflected normal loss and LINEX loss analytically (in some sections) and computationally. It is shown that both the risk under reflected normal loss and the risk under LINEX loss is higher than the risk under BLINEX loss. The key focus point under consideration is the estimation of the regression coefficients of a multiple regression model under two conditions, namely the presence of multicollinearity and linear restrictions imposed on the regression coefficients. In order to address the multicollinearity problem, the regression coefficients were adjusted by making use of Hoerl and Kennard’s (1970) approach in ridge regression. Furthermore, in situations where under- or overestimation exist, symmetric loss functions will not give optimal results and it was necessary to consider asymmetric loss functions. In the economic application, it was shown that a loss function which is both asymmetric and bounded to ensure a maximum upper bound for the loss, is the most appropriate function to use. In order to evaluate the effect that different ridge parameters have on the estimation, the risk values were calculated for all three ridge regression estimators under different conditions, namely an increase in variance, an increase in the level of multicollinearity, an increase in the number of parameters to be estimated in the regression model and an increase in the sample size. These results were compared to each other and summarised for all the proposed estimators and proposed loss functions. The comparison of the three proposed ridge regression estimators under all the proposed loss functions was also summarised for an increase in the sample size and an increase in variance. === Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2014. === lk2014 === Statistics === PhD === Unrestricted
author2 Arashi, Mohammad
author_facet Arashi, Mohammad
Kleyn, Judith
author Kleyn, Judith
author_sort Kleyn, Judith
title The performance of the preliminary test estimator under different loss functions
title_short The performance of the preliminary test estimator under different loss functions
title_full The performance of the preliminary test estimator under different loss functions
title_fullStr The performance of the preliminary test estimator under different loss functions
title_full_unstemmed The performance of the preliminary test estimator under different loss functions
title_sort performance of the preliminary test estimator under different loss functions
publisher University of Pretoria
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43132
Kleyn, J 2014, The performance of the preliminary test estimator under different loss functions, PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43132>
work_keys_str_mv AT kleynjudith theperformanceofthepreliminarytestestimatorunderdifferentlossfunctions
AT kleynjudith performanceofthepreliminarytestestimatorunderdifferentlossfunctions
_version_ 1719382712553308160