Citrus tristeza virus populations in Grapefruit trees, pre-immunized with two different cross-protecting sources

Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) is responsible for the most devastating viral disease of citrus crops and affects the profitability of citriculture on a worldwide scale. In South Africa, where CTV is endemic, the devastating effects of CTV severe-strain infections are reduced through the intentional...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Read, David Alan
Other Authors: Pietersen, Gerhard
Published: University of Pretoria 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2263/31293
Read, D 2011, Citrus tristeza virus populations in Grapefruit trees, pre-immunized with two different cross-protecting sources, MSc dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-09232011-133445/ >
http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-09232011-133445/
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-up-oai-repository.up.ac.za-2263-31293
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-up-oai-repository.up.ac.za-2263-312932020-06-02T03:18:06Z Citrus tristeza virus populations in Grapefruit trees, pre-immunized with two different cross-protecting sources Read, David Alan Pietersen, Gerhard readd@iafrica.com UCTD Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) is responsible for the most devastating viral disease of citrus crops and affects the profitability of citriculture on a worldwide scale. In South Africa, where CTV is endemic, the devastating effects of CTV severe-strain infections are reduced through the intentional inoculation of virus-free budwood with a mild-strain cross-protecting source. Cross-protection breakdown however occurs in grapefruit trees in South Africa and results in a reduction of yield and quality in grapefruit producing areas. Grapefruit cultivars are particularly sensitive to the stem-pitting effects of some severe CTV strains and despite the rigorous cross-protection scheme, severe stem-pitting and decline symptoms are still observed in the field. The GFMS 12 cross-protecting isolate was used as the cross-protecting source for grapefruit plantings in South Africa until its use was terminated in 2007. As early as 1993 however, severe stem-pitting was observed in the field. GFMS 35 has been employed as an alternate cross-protecting source, due to the apparent poor cross-protection ability of GFMS 12. Using nucleotide sequence analysis of a 5’ variable region (A-region) and a 3’ conserved region (p23 gene region), CTV population studies were performed on GFMS 12 and GFMS 35 pre-immunised Star Ruby and Flame trees in the field, in the hot production area of Malelane. The viral population of GFMS 12 and GFMS 35 sources, maintained on Mexican Lime and Star Ruby, plants were characterized as references. Severe VT-like strains dominated (up to 100% of clones) in all of the field samples. Of the two grapefruit cultivars sampled, no clear differences in their strain assemblage was obtained, suggesting that relative to each other, these cultivars played no role in shaping the CTV population strain composition that were observed. VT-like strain dominance was also observed in most of the sources maintained on Star Ruby. A shift in population strain composition was observed in the sources maintained on Mexican lime suggesting the important role that hosts may play in strain selection. A number of anomalous results were obtained for the sources that appeared not to follow the “general trend” of population strain composition observed in the other samples. These anomalies may have been caused by when the samples were collected, the age of the tissue material collected, PCR bias during amplification or some other factor resulting in a population shift in the sources. From these results it is near impossible to pinpoint the exact mechanism responsible for CTV cross-protection breakdown. However, the scale of the complexity of CTV population dynamics in South Africa has become clear. From this it will be possible to begin changing the way that cross-protection candidates are evaluated in South Africa, from an entirely empirical approach to one that incorporates much needed molecular methods. Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2011. Microbiology and Plant Pathology Unrestricted 2013-09-09T12:10:25Z 2011-09-23 2013-09-09T12:10:25Z 2011-09-09 2011-09-23 2011-09-23 Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2263/31293 Read, D 2011, Citrus tristeza virus populations in Grapefruit trees, pre-immunized with two different cross-protecting sources, MSc dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-09232011-133445/ > E11/9/189/hv http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-09232011-133445/ © 2011, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. University of Pretoria
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic UCTD
spellingShingle UCTD
Read, David Alan
Citrus tristeza virus populations in Grapefruit trees, pre-immunized with two different cross-protecting sources
description Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) is responsible for the most devastating viral disease of citrus crops and affects the profitability of citriculture on a worldwide scale. In South Africa, where CTV is endemic, the devastating effects of CTV severe-strain infections are reduced through the intentional inoculation of virus-free budwood with a mild-strain cross-protecting source. Cross-protection breakdown however occurs in grapefruit trees in South Africa and results in a reduction of yield and quality in grapefruit producing areas. Grapefruit cultivars are particularly sensitive to the stem-pitting effects of some severe CTV strains and despite the rigorous cross-protection scheme, severe stem-pitting and decline symptoms are still observed in the field. The GFMS 12 cross-protecting isolate was used as the cross-protecting source for grapefruit plantings in South Africa until its use was terminated in 2007. As early as 1993 however, severe stem-pitting was observed in the field. GFMS 35 has been employed as an alternate cross-protecting source, due to the apparent poor cross-protection ability of GFMS 12. Using nucleotide sequence analysis of a 5’ variable region (A-region) and a 3’ conserved region (p23 gene region), CTV population studies were performed on GFMS 12 and GFMS 35 pre-immunised Star Ruby and Flame trees in the field, in the hot production area of Malelane. The viral population of GFMS 12 and GFMS 35 sources, maintained on Mexican Lime and Star Ruby, plants were characterized as references. Severe VT-like strains dominated (up to 100% of clones) in all of the field samples. Of the two grapefruit cultivars sampled, no clear differences in their strain assemblage was obtained, suggesting that relative to each other, these cultivars played no role in shaping the CTV population strain composition that were observed. VT-like strain dominance was also observed in most of the sources maintained on Star Ruby. A shift in population strain composition was observed in the sources maintained on Mexican lime suggesting the important role that hosts may play in strain selection. A number of anomalous results were obtained for the sources that appeared not to follow the “general trend” of population strain composition observed in the other samples. These anomalies may have been caused by when the samples were collected, the age of the tissue material collected, PCR bias during amplification or some other factor resulting in a population shift in the sources. From these results it is near impossible to pinpoint the exact mechanism responsible for CTV cross-protection breakdown. However, the scale of the complexity of CTV population dynamics in South Africa has become clear. From this it will be possible to begin changing the way that cross-protection candidates are evaluated in South Africa, from an entirely empirical approach to one that incorporates much needed molecular methods. === Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2011. === Microbiology and Plant Pathology === Unrestricted
author2 Pietersen, Gerhard
author_facet Pietersen, Gerhard
Read, David Alan
author Read, David Alan
author_sort Read, David Alan
title Citrus tristeza virus populations in Grapefruit trees, pre-immunized with two different cross-protecting sources
title_short Citrus tristeza virus populations in Grapefruit trees, pre-immunized with two different cross-protecting sources
title_full Citrus tristeza virus populations in Grapefruit trees, pre-immunized with two different cross-protecting sources
title_fullStr Citrus tristeza virus populations in Grapefruit trees, pre-immunized with two different cross-protecting sources
title_full_unstemmed Citrus tristeza virus populations in Grapefruit trees, pre-immunized with two different cross-protecting sources
title_sort citrus tristeza virus populations in grapefruit trees, pre-immunized with two different cross-protecting sources
publisher University of Pretoria
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/31293
Read, D 2011, Citrus tristeza virus populations in Grapefruit trees, pre-immunized with two different cross-protecting sources, MSc dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-09232011-133445/ >
http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-09232011-133445/
work_keys_str_mv AT readdavidalan citrustristezaviruspopulationsingrapefruittreespreimmunizedwithtwodifferentcrossprotectingsources
_version_ 1719316169772498944