Simulated contracts and the transfer of ownership as a form of real security in South African law
Money lenders frequently use sale and lease back agreements as an alternative to other more conventional forms of security. These agreements are popular because they are simple and inexpensive to put in place. Unfortunately, South African courts give legal effect to the true intention of contrac...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10500/6770 |
id |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-unisa-oai-umkn-dsp01.int.unisa.ac.za-10500-6770 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-unisa-oai-umkn-dsp01.int.unisa.ac.za-10500-67702016-04-16T04:08:15Z Simulated contracts and the transfer of ownership as a form of real security in South African law Terblanche, Francis Stephen Scott, Susan (Susanna Johanna) Sale and lease back agreements Simulated contracts Reservation of ownership Cession Pledge Real security Principle of publicity Special notarial bond General notarial bond Public register 346.47068 Pledges (Law) -- South Africa Personal property -- South Africa Security (Law) -- South Africa Loans -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Sales -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Leases -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Money lenders frequently use sale and lease back agreements as an alternative to other more conventional forms of security. These agreements are popular because they are simple and inexpensive to put in place. Unfortunately, South African courts give legal effect to the true intention of contracting parties. Sale and lease back agreements are often held to be simulated contracts and as such they are enforced as disguised pledges. One of the few alternative security options available to money lenders, is a notarial bond registered in terms of the Security By Means of Movable Property Act 57 of 1993. This act has been criticised for creating an ineffective form of security that is costly and cumbersome to put in place. It is suggested that the current security options available to money lenders are supplemented with the creation of a more user friendly public register for the registration of security interests. Private Law LL.M. 2012-10-17T07:18:11Z 2012-10-17T07:18:11Z 1997-11 2012-10 Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/10500/6770 en 1 online resource (28 leaves) |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Sale and lease back agreements Simulated contracts Reservation of ownership Cession Pledge Real security Principle of publicity Special notarial bond General notarial bond Public register 346.47068 Pledges (Law) -- South Africa Personal property -- South Africa Security (Law) -- South Africa Loans -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Sales -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Leases -- Law and legislation -- South Africa |
spellingShingle |
Sale and lease back agreements Simulated contracts Reservation of ownership Cession Pledge Real security Principle of publicity Special notarial bond General notarial bond Public register 346.47068 Pledges (Law) -- South Africa Personal property -- South Africa Security (Law) -- South Africa Loans -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Sales -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Leases -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Terblanche, Francis Stephen Simulated contracts and the transfer of ownership as a form of real security in South African law |
description |
Money lenders frequently use sale and lease back agreements as an
alternative to other more conventional forms of security. These
agreements are popular because they are simple and inexpensive to put
in place. Unfortunately, South African courts give legal effect to the true
intention of contracting parties. Sale and lease back agreements are
often held to be simulated contracts and as such they are enforced as
disguised pledges. One of the few alternative security options available to
money lenders, is a notarial bond registered in terms of the Security By
Means of Movable Property Act 57 of 1993. This act has been criticised
for creating an ineffective form of security that is costly and cumbersome
to put in place. It is suggested that the current security options available
to money lenders are supplemented with the creation of a more user
friendly public register for the registration of security interests. === Private Law === LL.M. |
author2 |
Scott, Susan (Susanna Johanna) |
author_facet |
Scott, Susan (Susanna Johanna) Terblanche, Francis Stephen |
author |
Terblanche, Francis Stephen |
author_sort |
Terblanche, Francis Stephen |
title |
Simulated contracts and the transfer of ownership as a form of real security in South African law |
title_short |
Simulated contracts and the transfer of ownership as a form of real security in South African law |
title_full |
Simulated contracts and the transfer of ownership as a form of real security in South African law |
title_fullStr |
Simulated contracts and the transfer of ownership as a form of real security in South African law |
title_full_unstemmed |
Simulated contracts and the transfer of ownership as a form of real security in South African law |
title_sort |
simulated contracts and the transfer of ownership as a form of real security in south african law |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/6770 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT terblanchefrancisstephen simulatedcontractsandthetransferofownershipasaformofrealsecurityinsouthafricanlaw |
_version_ |
1718224620479315968 |