The cross-cultural validity and comparability of the sixteenth personality factor questionnaire

• Main Author: Tack, H. (Harold)
• Other Authors: Flowers, John, 1943-
• Format: Others
• Language: en
• Published: 2015
• Subjects: Cross-cultural psychology; Personality; Personality assessment; Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (SA92 Version); Population group; Gender; 155.283; Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire; Personality tests; Ethnopsychology
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16165

The focus of this study is the Sixteen Personality Factor Quenstionnaire, South Africam 1992 version (16 PF, SA92). This personality questionnaire was derived from the 16 PF which was developed in the United States and was adapted for South African conditions in 1992. The aim of this study is to determine whether the scores of the 16 PF, SA92 are cross-culturally valid and comparable in South Africa. The sample consisted of White and African (male and female) applicants who applied for positions in a South African state department. To achieve the aims outlined in the introductory chapter, construct comparability and item comparability research was conducted. Descriptive statistics were also calculated to indicate the performance of the various sub-samples (White, African, male and female). The results indicated that the population variable as opposed to the gender variable had the greatest influence on the scores obtained. Problems existed with the construct and item comparability of the 16 PF, SA92 when the different population groups were compared. Mean differences were also found on the majority of factors of the 16 PF, SA92 when the scores of the different population groups were compared. The implications of using 16 PF, SA92 were outlined and several assessment options were presented for users of the 16 PF, SA92. === Industrial and Organisational Psychology === M. Admin. (Industrial Psychology)