Assessing the efficacy of the AU sanctions policies with regard to unconstitutional changes in government : the examples of Guinea and Madagascar

• Main Author: Mkhize, Siphiwe
• Other Authors: Hoeane, Thabisi
• Format: Others
• Language: en
• Published: 2014
• Subjects: African Union; Sanctions; Unconstitutional changes; Coups; Guinea; Madagascar; SADC; ECOWAS; 327.117096; Coups d'etat > Guinea; Coups d'etat > Madagascar; Guinea > Politics and government; Sanctions (Law) > Guinea; Sanctions (Law) > Madagascar; Madagascar > Politics and government
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10500/13960

Unconstitutional changes, especially coups d’états, have undoubtedly eroded peace and security in many parts of the African continent. These occurrences have also stunted the development of democracy in some African states. The African Union (AU), supported by sub-regional bodies, addresses this problem by imposing sanctions on the regimes that acquire power through coups with the aim of restoring political order. However, this sanctions policy has produced mixed results. In some cases, these sanctions managed to succeed in achieving their objectives (Guinea) while in other instances sanctions failed to achieve their objectives (Madagascar). It is therefore imperative to inquire into the circumstances and assess the conditions under which the AU sanctions policies failed and succeeded in restoring political order to states that experience coups d’états. === Political Sciences === M.A. (International Politics)