Bioprospecting and intellectual property rights on African plant commons and knowledge: a new form of colonization viewed from an ethical perspective

• Main Author: Lenkabula, Puleng
• Other Authors: Motlhabi, M.B.G.
• Format: Others
• Language: en
• Published: 2009
• Subjects: Bioprospecting; Biopiracy; Intellectual property rights; Patents; Ethics; Botho/ ubuntu; Justice; Colonialism; Globalization; Privatisation; Multinational companies; Trips; 241.096; Christian ethics > Africa; Traditional ecological knowledge > Africa; Ethnoscience > Africa; Ethnology > Africa; Medicinal plants > Africa; Biodiversity > Africa; Intellectual property > Africa; Cultural property > Africa
• Online Access: Lenkabula, Puleng (2009) Bioprospecting and intellectual property rights on African plant commons and knowledge: a new form of colonization viewed from an ethical perspective, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/719>; http://hdl.handle.net/10500/719

This study engages in an ethical examination of contemporary socio-ecological and economic issues which takes seriously the plight of Africa, African communities, indigenous knowledge and biodiversity. It studies the impact of bioprospecting, biopiracy and intellectual property rights regimes on the protection, use, access to, and conservation of biodiversity and indigenous knowledge in Africa. The study also examines the ways in which northern multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and their agents prospect and convert African resources (biological commons and indigenous knowledge) into their intellectual property as well as private property. It argues that the transfer of African biological commons and indigenous knowledge is exacerbated by economic globalisation and the neo-colonial mentality of conquest concealed under the guise of commerce. The study demonstrates through concrete case studies the tactics used by northern multinational corporations to claim these resources as their intellectual property rights and private property. It observes that the privatisation of biological commons and indigenous knowledge only brings about nominal or no benefits to African communities who have nurtured and continue to nurture them. It also observes that this privatisation results in fewer benefits for biodiversity as they lead to the promotion of monoculture, i.e. commercialisation of all things. To address the injustice and exploitative implications of bioprospecting, biopiracy and intellectual property rights, the study recommends the adoption and implementation of the African model law, the establishment of defensive intellectual property rights mechanisms, and the strategy of resistance and advocacy. It suggests that these measures ought to be grounded on the African normative principle of botho and the Christian ethical principle of justice. === Systematic Theology and Theological Ethics === D.Th.(Theological Ethics)