Public participation in environmental impact assessment : an effective tool for sustainable development a South African perspective (Gautrain)

• Main Author: Aregbeshola, Maryam Titilayo
• Other Authors: Mearns, Kevin Frank
• Format: Others
• Language: en
• Published: 2009
• Subjects: Public participation; Environmental impact assessment; Integrated environmental management (IEM) South Africa; Sustainable development; 338.927; Environmental policy; Economic development > Environmental aspects; Environmental indicators; Globalization > Economic aspects
• Online Access: Aregbeshola, Maryam Titilayo (2009) Public participation in environmental impact assessment : an effective tool for sustainable development a South African perspective (Gautrain), University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2999>; http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2999

The need for public participation in the development of policies, programmes or actions has been widely accepted by both government and private sectors because of the benefits of such involvement. Involving the public in the development of any policy, programme or action is, however, a daunting task. Public involvement in the development of a policy or action often leads to protest, legal litigation, criticism and delay in carrying out the project. The main objectives of this research are to examine the process of public participation in the Gautrain project and to interrogate how public involvement in the decision-making processes of environmental concerns can be improved. A quantitative study was conducted to describe and explore the process of public participation in the Gautrain environmental impact assessment procedure. The purposive sampling method was used. Thereafter, the data generated was analysed using statistical tools such as charts, tables and the Wilcoxon Mann Whitney U test to examine the similarities and differences in the response patterns of the public and the project proponent. Cronbach alpha statistical methodology was also used to test the reliability of the measurement. The findings are discussed in relation to the objectives of the study and research hypotheses. The results indicate that (1) the public were not involved early enough during the project planning and design phases; (2) adequate information was not provided to the public; and (3) public input does not have much impact on decisionmaking processes. The study does, however, indicate that the process has enhanced the participants’ learning and that the process of participation has improved in recent time as compared to the 2002-2003 periods. The study concludes by providing relevant solutions and recommendations. === Environmental Sciences === M. Sc. (Environmental Management)