Recognition and enforcement of foreign custody orders and the associated problem of international parental kidnapping : a model for South Africa

• Main Author: Nicholson, Caroline Margaret Anne
• Other Authors: Edwards, A. B.
• Format: Others
• Published: 2015
• Subjects: Acquiescence; Child abductiion; Contempt; Council of Europe Convention; Criminal liability; Enforcement; Extradition; Finality; Foreign judgements; Full faith and credit; Grave risk; Hague Convention; Jurisdiction; Kidnapping; Merger; Custody; Delict; Parental abduction; Pre-emption; Psychological harm; Public policy; Recognition; Res judicata; Retention; Wrongful removal; 346.17068; Parental kidnapping > South Africa; Parental kidnapping > International cooperation; Conflict of laws > Custody of children; Children (International law)
• Online Access: Nicholson, Caroline Margaret Anne (1998) Recognition and enforcement of foreign custody orders and the associated problem of international parental kidnapping : a model for South Africa, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/17579>; http://hdl.handle.net/10500/17579

Within the context of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments the recognition and enforcement of foreign custody orders is unique. By reason of the fact that custody orders are always modifiable "in the best interests of the child" they cannot be regarded as final orders and are thus not capable of recognition and enforcement on the same basis as final orders. The failure of courts to afford foreign custody orders recognition and enforcement in the normal course has created the potential for a person deprived of the custody of a child to remove the child from the jurisdiction of a court rendering a custody order to another jurisdiction within which he or she may seek a new, more favourable order. This potential for behaviour in contempt of an existing order has been exploited by numerous parents who feel aggrieved by custody orders. The problem of parental child snatching has escalated to such a degree that the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction was drawn up to introduce uniform measures amongst member states to address this problem. Despite being a meaningful step in the fight against international child abduction the Hague Convention does not fully resolve the problem. For this reason other measures have been suggested to supplement the Convention. The different approaches taken in South Africa, the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States of America to recognition and enforcement of foreign custody orders and the measures to overcome the problem of international child abduction are examined and a comparative methodology applied to the design of a model approach for South Africa. The object of this model is to permit the South African courts to address the international child abduction problem without falling prey to any of the pitfalls experienced elsewhere in the legal systems examined. === Law === LL.D.