A measurement process for quantifying the progress towards real commercial equity

M.Comm. === Affirmative action has been greatly debated as a means of righting the injustices of South Africa's past. Its proponents claim it to be an effective way of providing opportunities to those falling under the definition of previously disadvantaged, while cries of "reverse discrim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cilliers, Michelle
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10210/4055
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uj-uj-1712
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uj-uj-17122017-09-16T04:00:36ZA measurement process for quantifying the progress towards real commercial equityCilliers, MichelleAffirmative action programsIndustrial procurementM.Comm.Affirmative action has been greatly debated as a means of righting the injustices of South Africa's past. Its proponents claim it to be an effective way of providing opportunities to those falling under the definition of previously disadvantaged, while cries of "reverse discrimination" echo from those vigorously opposed to it. One of the ways in which empowerment can be achieved is through encouraging government and businesses to make use of affirmative companies in the procurement of day to day goods and services. The first initiative from government came in the form of the Ten Point Plan from the Departments of Public Works and Finance. This was later encapsulated in the Green Paper on Public Sector Reform and the "Resource Specification for the Targeting of Affirmable Business Enterprises". This allowed businesses quoting for government work to score themselves against certain criteria, viz. either by virtue of their being affirmable business enterprises (ABEs), which are two thirds owned by previously disadvantaged individuals (POls), or by entering into joint ventures of various kinds with ABEs. It is believed that the approach of basing a company's contribution to affirmative procurement purely on two-thirds ownership is limiting, and that more aspects need to be investigated to determine the level of empowerment a company is offering its employees. In addition, the high percentage ownership is a temptation for companies to engage in fronting, where token appointments are made and there is no true management or control by the company's PDI management. Subsequently it is vital that alternative approaches be taken. Corporations need to keep track of their spend with PDI owned companies, but need to know how to determine how effective these are in implementing to true economic empowerment.2011-11-21Thesisuj:1712http://hdl.handle.net/10210/4055
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic Affirmative action programs
Industrial procurement
spellingShingle Affirmative action programs
Industrial procurement
Cilliers, Michelle
A measurement process for quantifying the progress towards real commercial equity
description M.Comm. === Affirmative action has been greatly debated as a means of righting the injustices of South Africa's past. Its proponents claim it to be an effective way of providing opportunities to those falling under the definition of previously disadvantaged, while cries of "reverse discrimination" echo from those vigorously opposed to it. One of the ways in which empowerment can be achieved is through encouraging government and businesses to make use of affirmative companies in the procurement of day to day goods and services. The first initiative from government came in the form of the Ten Point Plan from the Departments of Public Works and Finance. This was later encapsulated in the Green Paper on Public Sector Reform and the "Resource Specification for the Targeting of Affirmable Business Enterprises". This allowed businesses quoting for government work to score themselves against certain criteria, viz. either by virtue of their being affirmable business enterprises (ABEs), which are two thirds owned by previously disadvantaged individuals (POls), or by entering into joint ventures of various kinds with ABEs. It is believed that the approach of basing a company's contribution to affirmative procurement purely on two-thirds ownership is limiting, and that more aspects need to be investigated to determine the level of empowerment a company is offering its employees. In addition, the high percentage ownership is a temptation for companies to engage in fronting, where token appointments are made and there is no true management or control by the company's PDI management. Subsequently it is vital that alternative approaches be taken. Corporations need to keep track of their spend with PDI owned companies, but need to know how to determine how effective these are in implementing to true economic empowerment.
author Cilliers, Michelle
author_facet Cilliers, Michelle
author_sort Cilliers, Michelle
title A measurement process for quantifying the progress towards real commercial equity
title_short A measurement process for quantifying the progress towards real commercial equity
title_full A measurement process for quantifying the progress towards real commercial equity
title_fullStr A measurement process for quantifying the progress towards real commercial equity
title_full_unstemmed A measurement process for quantifying the progress towards real commercial equity
title_sort measurement process for quantifying the progress towards real commercial equity
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/10210/4055
work_keys_str_mv AT cilliersmichelle ameasurementprocessforquantifyingtheprogresstowardsrealcommercialequity
AT cilliersmichelle measurementprocessforquantifyingtheprogresstowardsrealcommercialequity
_version_ 1718534311043399680