A comparative study between low level laser therapy and myofascial dry needling on active gluteus medius trigger points

M.Tech. (Chiropractic) === Myofascial trigger points (MTrP’s) cause acute discomfort to intense pain and often lead to the use of pain medication as well as loss of man hours (Simons, Travell and Simons, 1999a; Tough, White, Cummings, Richards and Campbell, 2009). Dry needling is very effective and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Van Heerden, Marili
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10210/12371
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uj-uj-12581
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uj-uj-125812017-09-16T04:00:58ZA comparative study between low level laser therapy and myofascial dry needling on active gluteus medius trigger pointsVan Heerden, MariliMyofascial pain syndromes - Chiropractic treatmentGluteus mediusAcupunctureLasers - Therapeutic useM.Tech. (Chiropractic)Myofascial trigger points (MTrP’s) cause acute discomfort to intense pain and often lead to the use of pain medication as well as loss of man hours (Simons, Travell and Simons, 1999a; Tough, White, Cummings, Richards and Campbell, 2009). Dry needling is very effective and is widely used for the treatment of MTrP’s (Vulfsons, Ratmansky and Kalichman, 2012), but comes with various significant drawbacks, such as the experience of pain during or after treatment (post-needling soreness) or individuals with needle phobias (Unruh, Strong and Wright, 2002). More serious risks also exist, including damage to the viscera (Dommerholt and Fernández-de-las-Peñas, 2013). Low level laser therapy (LLLT) is a non-invasive technique and very little discomfort or pain is experienced by the patient during and after treatment. LLLT is effective in the short- and long-term relief of trigger points and myofascial pain syndrome. Therefore it can easily serve as an alternative to myofacial dry needling (Chow and Barnsley, 2005). This study aimed to determine whether LLLT or myofascial dry needling is more effective in the treatment of active MTrP’s, specifically those of the gluteus medius muscle. It also aimed to determine if LLLT could serve as an alternative treatment to dry needling in cases where dry needling is contraindicated or not desired. Thirty participants who complied with the inclusion criteria were divided into one of two groups. Group 1 (n=15) received dosages of LLLT directly to the active MTrP’s in the gluteus medius muscle and Group 2 (n=15) received myofascial dry needling to active MTrP’s in the gluteus medius muscle. Each participant attended 6 treatment sessions over a course of 2 weeks as well as a 7th measurements-only session.2014-10-13Thesisuj:12581http://hdl.handle.net/10210/12371University of Johannesburg
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic Myofascial pain syndromes - Chiropractic treatment
Gluteus medius
Acupuncture
Lasers - Therapeutic use
spellingShingle Myofascial pain syndromes - Chiropractic treatment
Gluteus medius
Acupuncture
Lasers - Therapeutic use
Van Heerden, Marili
A comparative study between low level laser therapy and myofascial dry needling on active gluteus medius trigger points
description M.Tech. (Chiropractic) === Myofascial trigger points (MTrP’s) cause acute discomfort to intense pain and often lead to the use of pain medication as well as loss of man hours (Simons, Travell and Simons, 1999a; Tough, White, Cummings, Richards and Campbell, 2009). Dry needling is very effective and is widely used for the treatment of MTrP’s (Vulfsons, Ratmansky and Kalichman, 2012), but comes with various significant drawbacks, such as the experience of pain during or after treatment (post-needling soreness) or individuals with needle phobias (Unruh, Strong and Wright, 2002). More serious risks also exist, including damage to the viscera (Dommerholt and Fernández-de-las-Peñas, 2013). Low level laser therapy (LLLT) is a non-invasive technique and very little discomfort or pain is experienced by the patient during and after treatment. LLLT is effective in the short- and long-term relief of trigger points and myofascial pain syndrome. Therefore it can easily serve as an alternative to myofacial dry needling (Chow and Barnsley, 2005). This study aimed to determine whether LLLT or myofascial dry needling is more effective in the treatment of active MTrP’s, specifically those of the gluteus medius muscle. It also aimed to determine if LLLT could serve as an alternative treatment to dry needling in cases where dry needling is contraindicated or not desired. Thirty participants who complied with the inclusion criteria were divided into one of two groups. Group 1 (n=15) received dosages of LLLT directly to the active MTrP’s in the gluteus medius muscle and Group 2 (n=15) received myofascial dry needling to active MTrP’s in the gluteus medius muscle. Each participant attended 6 treatment sessions over a course of 2 weeks as well as a 7th measurements-only session.
author Van Heerden, Marili
author_facet Van Heerden, Marili
author_sort Van Heerden, Marili
title A comparative study between low level laser therapy and myofascial dry needling on active gluteus medius trigger points
title_short A comparative study between low level laser therapy and myofascial dry needling on active gluteus medius trigger points
title_full A comparative study between low level laser therapy and myofascial dry needling on active gluteus medius trigger points
title_fullStr A comparative study between low level laser therapy and myofascial dry needling on active gluteus medius trigger points
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study between low level laser therapy and myofascial dry needling on active gluteus medius trigger points
title_sort comparative study between low level laser therapy and myofascial dry needling on active gluteus medius trigger points
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10210/12371
work_keys_str_mv AT vanheerdenmarili acomparativestudybetweenlowlevellasertherapyandmyofascialdryneedlingonactivegluteusmediustriggerpoints
AT vanheerdenmarili comparativestudybetweenlowlevellasertherapyandmyofascialdryneedlingonactivegluteusmediustriggerpoints
_version_ 1718534922824581120