| Summary: | M.Sc. (Zoology) === National water quality monitoring in South Africa has in the past mainly focused on measuring physical and chemical variables. However, it is increasingly realised that measuring physical and chemical variables on their own cannot provide an accurate account of the general "health" of an aquatic ecosystem. Biological communities, on the other hand, are accurate indicators of overall environmental conditions. Water quality management must, therefore, rely on comparative data for both chemical composition and biological effects. In fact, it appears as if biological monitoring (biomonitoring) is worldwide becoming a primary tool in assessing environmental condition and verifying compliance with effluent discharge. This study classified different biomonitoring approaches and techniques under bioassessment (referring to the field oriented biomonitoring protocols which make use of biotic indices to assess water quality); bioassays (toxicity tests which is usually laboratory-based); behavioural bioassays (including aspects such as early warning systems, and preference and avoidance studies); bacteriological studies (the monitoring of certain microbes to allow the detection of faecal contamination); measurement of bioaccumulation (referring to the methods by which the uptake and retention of chemicals in the body of an organism can be monitored); and fish pathology (fish health studies dealing with the causes, processes and effects of disease). Habitat assessment and evaluation was identified as an essential part of any biosurvey. There can be little uncertainty about the mutual dependence of habitat quality, biological health and chemical characteristics of water in the environment. Relative habitat condition, as the principal determinant of attainable biological potential, should set the context for interpreting the results of a biosurvey and can be used as a general predictor of biological condition. Chemistry can further help to explain and characterise certain impacts. The Crocodile River, Eastern Transvaal, was selected for conducting a case study. The SASS2 rapid bioassessment protocol, as well as a habitat quality index (Hal) was used during five consecutive biosurveys. From the results obtained in this study, it appears as if biomonitoring can be used to good effect in overall environmental assessment. The SASS2 index appeared to be both a robust and sensitive indicator of environmental condition. Application of the SASS2 technique on a regional or even national basis should be feasible with regard to simplicity and practicality. It is also cheaper and less labour intensive than comprehensive chemical monitoring. However, bioassessments should not replace but rather compliment chemical and physical monitoring.
|
|---|
