COMPETENCE LEVELS OF ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION FACILITATORS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA

The complex nature of the construction industry calls for an effective claims management system which is supported by Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR). Research indicates that ADR is not applied effectively in the industry, which raises the question as to the competence levels of practicing profes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: du Preez, Olive RC
Other Authors: Prof JJP Verster
Format: Others
Language:en-uk
Published: University of the Free State 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.uovs.ac.za//theses/available/etd-05172013-110814/restricted/
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-ufs-oai-etd.uovs.ac.za-etd-05172013-110814
record_format oai_dc
collection NDLTD
language en-uk
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Quantity Surveying and Construction Management
spellingShingle Quantity Surveying and Construction Management
du Preez, Olive RC
COMPETENCE LEVELS OF ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION FACILITATORS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA
description The complex nature of the construction industry calls for an effective claims management system which is supported by Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR). Research indicates that ADR is not applied effectively in the industry, which raises the question as to the competence levels of practicing professionals in the role of ADR facilitator. The purpose of the study was to identify the requirements for effective ADR practice and to determine the competence levels of practicing professionals facilitating ADR in the South African construction industry. The findings of the research are intended to determine possible education and training requirements which may be employed to ultimately improve the contribution of ADR in the industry. A literature review was conducted to identify the requirements for effective ADR practice based on international standard practice. A questionnaire based on identified competencies was then developed and administered amongst the practicing professionals in order to determine current knowledge, skills, attributes and experience levels of practicing professionals in the South African construction industry. The findings of the data analysis were plotted on a competence model which reflected the key competencies as identified in the literature review. The competence models reflected the competence levels of practitioners in the industry. A situational competence model was developed illustrating the development process required for ADR facilitators in the construction industry through which professionals should progress in achieving competence however; the model is based on the current situation and will be subjected to variations as the situation changes. The situational competence model suggests that practicing professionals progress through four stages before becoming fully competent in facilitating ADR. Respondents were also grouped into age groups in order to address education and training compared to experience gained. This was intended to determine at which point competence is achieved by comparing the state of the new entrants to the industry with the more experienced professionals. Qualitative data was obtained by means of interviews and open ended questions posed in the questionnaire provided the information required to assess the current situation in the industry. The findings indicated that the problem areas tend toward the the application of the methods, skills and techniques however, respondents consider the application of the fundamentals of ADR important and they are applied effectively as required for successful dispute resolution. The high ratings on the self analysis in terms of the active listening competence raised the question as to the possibility that there may have been a degree of misinterpretation regarding the effective application of this competency. This response also suggests the possible influence of response bias. It was concluded that ADR in the industry is not applied according to the requirements of standard practice and according to the data analysis of the self evaluation; practicing professionals do not meet the requirements for competence in the practice of ADR. It was also identified that experience needs to be addressed in order to achieve competence. Practicing professionals are knowledgeable of the requirements for effective practice, however, experience is lacking. A further need which was identified in practice was for conciliation to be facilitated on site in order to minimize the risk of dispute, in the project environment. The findings support the need for more emphasis to be placed on ADR in the construction industry in the form of education, training and mentorship.
author2 Prof JJP Verster
author_facet Prof JJP Verster
du Preez, Olive RC
author du Preez, Olive RC
author_sort du Preez, Olive RC
title COMPETENCE LEVELS OF ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION FACILITATORS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA
title_short COMPETENCE LEVELS OF ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION FACILITATORS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA
title_full COMPETENCE LEVELS OF ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION FACILITATORS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA
title_fullStr COMPETENCE LEVELS OF ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION FACILITATORS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA
title_full_unstemmed COMPETENCE LEVELS OF ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION FACILITATORS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA
title_sort competence levels of alternate dispute resolution facilitators in the construction industry in south africa
publisher University of the Free State
publishDate 2013
url http://etd.uovs.ac.za//theses/available/etd-05172013-110814/restricted/
work_keys_str_mv AT dupreezoliverc competencelevelsofalternatedisputeresolutionfacilitatorsintheconstructionindustryinsouthafrica
_version_ 1716633961936977921
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-ufs-oai-etd.uovs.ac.za-etd-05172013-1108142014-02-08T03:46:18Z COMPETENCE LEVELS OF ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION FACILITATORS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA du Preez, Olive RC Quantity Surveying and Construction Management The complex nature of the construction industry calls for an effective claims management system which is supported by Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR). Research indicates that ADR is not applied effectively in the industry, which raises the question as to the competence levels of practicing professionals in the role of ADR facilitator. The purpose of the study was to identify the requirements for effective ADR practice and to determine the competence levels of practicing professionals facilitating ADR in the South African construction industry. The findings of the research are intended to determine possible education and training requirements which may be employed to ultimately improve the contribution of ADR in the industry. A literature review was conducted to identify the requirements for effective ADR practice based on international standard practice. A questionnaire based on identified competencies was then developed and administered amongst the practicing professionals in order to determine current knowledge, skills, attributes and experience levels of practicing professionals in the South African construction industry. The findings of the data analysis were plotted on a competence model which reflected the key competencies as identified in the literature review. The competence models reflected the competence levels of practitioners in the industry. A situational competence model was developed illustrating the development process required for ADR facilitators in the construction industry through which professionals should progress in achieving competence however; the model is based on the current situation and will be subjected to variations as the situation changes. The situational competence model suggests that practicing professionals progress through four stages before becoming fully competent in facilitating ADR. Respondents were also grouped into age groups in order to address education and training compared to experience gained. This was intended to determine at which point competence is achieved by comparing the state of the new entrants to the industry with the more experienced professionals. Qualitative data was obtained by means of interviews and open ended questions posed in the questionnaire provided the information required to assess the current situation in the industry. The findings indicated that the problem areas tend toward the the application of the methods, skills and techniques however, respondents consider the application of the fundamentals of ADR important and they are applied effectively as required for successful dispute resolution. The high ratings on the self analysis in terms of the active listening competence raised the question as to the possibility that there may have been a degree of misinterpretation regarding the effective application of this competency. This response also suggests the possible influence of response bias. It was concluded that ADR in the industry is not applied according to the requirements of standard practice and according to the data analysis of the self evaluation; practicing professionals do not meet the requirements for competence in the practice of ADR. It was also identified that experience needs to be addressed in order to achieve competence. Practicing professionals are knowledgeable of the requirements for effective practice, however, experience is lacking. A further need which was identified in practice was for conciliation to be facilitated on site in order to minimize the risk of dispute, in the project environment. The findings support the need for more emphasis to be placed on ADR in the construction industry in the form of education, training and mentorship. Prof JJP Verster Dr FH Berry University of the Free State 2013-05-17 text application/pdf http://etd.uovs.ac.za//theses/available/etd-05172013-110814/restricted/ http://etd.uovs.ac.za//theses/available/etd-05172013-110814/restricted/ en-uk unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University Free State or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.