A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995
The Labour Relations Act of 1995, hailed as an achievement to rank in importance alongside the Industrial Conciliation Act of 1924, remains the legal punchbag of the nineties. Despite its hurricane passage through NEDLAC and Parliament, the criticism generated by its predecessor (the Draft Bill) rem...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Dissertation |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculty of Law
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35466 |
id |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-35466 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-354662021-12-16T05:32:33Z A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 Marinus, Grant Brett Thompson, Clive Collective bargaining The Labour Relations Act of 1995, hailed as an achievement to rank in importance alongside the Industrial Conciliation Act of 1924, remains the legal punchbag of the nineties. Despite its hurricane passage through NEDLAC and Parliament, the criticism generated by its predecessor (the Draft Bill) remains for the most part unanswered. It would appear that the drafter's optimism, epitomised by the kind fashionable, rhetoric that has become equally synonymous with this the age of co-operation and reconstruction, will have to suffice. 2021-12-14T09:53:44Z 2021-12-14T09:53:44Z 1996_ 2021-11-26T08:27:57Z Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35466 eng application/pdf Faculty of Law Institute of Development and Labour Law |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Dissertation |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Collective bargaining |
spellingShingle |
Collective bargaining Marinus, Grant Brett A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 |
description |
The Labour Relations Act of 1995, hailed as an achievement to rank in importance alongside the Industrial Conciliation Act of 1924, remains the legal punchbag of the nineties. Despite its hurricane passage through NEDLAC and Parliament, the criticism generated by its predecessor (the Draft Bill) remains for the most part unanswered. It would appear that the drafter's optimism, epitomised by the kind fashionable, rhetoric that has become equally synonymous with this the age of co-operation and reconstruction, will have to suffice. |
author2 |
Thompson, Clive |
author_facet |
Thompson, Clive Marinus, Grant Brett |
author |
Marinus, Grant Brett |
author_sort |
Marinus, Grant Brett |
title |
A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 |
title_short |
A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 |
title_full |
A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 |
title_fullStr |
A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 |
title_full_unstemmed |
A critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 |
title_sort |
critical discussion of the collective bargaining provisions in labour relations act 66 of 1995 |
publisher |
Faculty of Law |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35466 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marinusgrantbrett acriticaldiscussionofthecollectivebargainingprovisionsinlabourrelationsact66of1995 AT marinusgrantbrett criticaldiscussionofthecollectivebargainingprovisionsinlabourrelationsact66of1995 |
_version_ |
1723964694953197568 |