How well do buffer circles capture the ranging behaviours of territorial raptors?

As the world's human population increases, so does the competition for natural resources between humans and wildlife. This competition may be intense for apex predators, such as raptors, which generally require large natural areas in order to maintain their populations. Anthropogenic developmen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brink, René
Other Authors: Amar, Arjun
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Science 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11427/33229
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-33229
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-332292021-05-20T05:12:26Z How well do buffer circles capture the ranging behaviours of territorial raptors? Brink, René Amar, Arjun Murgatroyd, Megan Conservation Biology As the world's human population increases, so does the competition for natural resources between humans and wildlife. This competition may be intense for apex predators, such as raptors, which generally require large natural areas in order to maintain their populations. Anthropogenic development within territories can cause individuals to either abandon these sites, reduce their breeding productivity, or cause direct mortality to the territory holding birds. To mitigate such impacts, one method, employed as part of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA), is the use buffer circles centred on nest sites. Within these buffers the most damaging forms of development are prohibited. This approach assumes that raptors use the space around their nest in a uniform way, but this assumption may not always be correct and few have evaluated the effectiveness of buffer circles at protecting a species' home range. This study uses tracking data to evaluate the effectiveness of buffer circles to cover the ranging movements of six southern African raptor species, throughout the year, as well as during their breeding and non-breeding season. My study revealed that buffer circles whose dimensions were based on the species' 95% Kernel Density Estimate (KDE) did relatively well at capturing the proportion of individual GPS fixes, but did less well at capturing the KDE area from tracked birds. For buffer circles to capture 95% of the home range polygons (95% KDE) they would generally need to be at least twice as large as those that were derived from the 95% KDE home range area, and for some species with very large home ranges (e.g. Lappet-faced Vultures) even buffer circles that were 3 times the size failed to cover 95% of the KDE polygons. 2021-05-05T14:01:27Z 2021-05-05T14:01:27Z 2020 2021-05-05T14:00:48Z Master Thesis Masters MSc http://hdl.handle.net/11427/33229 eng application/pdf Faculty of Science FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic Conservation Biology
spellingShingle Conservation Biology
Brink, René
How well do buffer circles capture the ranging behaviours of territorial raptors?
description As the world's human population increases, so does the competition for natural resources between humans and wildlife. This competition may be intense for apex predators, such as raptors, which generally require large natural areas in order to maintain their populations. Anthropogenic development within territories can cause individuals to either abandon these sites, reduce their breeding productivity, or cause direct mortality to the territory holding birds. To mitigate such impacts, one method, employed as part of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA), is the use buffer circles centred on nest sites. Within these buffers the most damaging forms of development are prohibited. This approach assumes that raptors use the space around their nest in a uniform way, but this assumption may not always be correct and few have evaluated the effectiveness of buffer circles at protecting a species' home range. This study uses tracking data to evaluate the effectiveness of buffer circles to cover the ranging movements of six southern African raptor species, throughout the year, as well as during their breeding and non-breeding season. My study revealed that buffer circles whose dimensions were based on the species' 95% Kernel Density Estimate (KDE) did relatively well at capturing the proportion of individual GPS fixes, but did less well at capturing the KDE area from tracked birds. For buffer circles to capture 95% of the home range polygons (95% KDE) they would generally need to be at least twice as large as those that were derived from the 95% KDE home range area, and for some species with very large home ranges (e.g. Lappet-faced Vultures) even buffer circles that were 3 times the size failed to cover 95% of the KDE polygons.
author2 Amar, Arjun
author_facet Amar, Arjun
Brink, René
author Brink, René
author_sort Brink, René
title How well do buffer circles capture the ranging behaviours of territorial raptors?
title_short How well do buffer circles capture the ranging behaviours of territorial raptors?
title_full How well do buffer circles capture the ranging behaviours of territorial raptors?
title_fullStr How well do buffer circles capture the ranging behaviours of territorial raptors?
title_full_unstemmed How well do buffer circles capture the ranging behaviours of territorial raptors?
title_sort how well do buffer circles capture the ranging behaviours of territorial raptors?
publisher Faculty of Science
publishDate 2021
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/33229
work_keys_str_mv AT brinkrene howwelldobuffercirclescapturetherangingbehavioursofterritorialraptors
_version_ 1719405539312533504