The criminalisation of cartels in South Africa, United States and Australia and the effects of the Corporate Leniency Policy

With the recent changes to the Competition Act1 , specifically with the inclusion of Section 73A2 which came into effect on the 1 May 2017 the amendment now makes provision for cartelists to face criminal charges for infringing Section 43 of the Act. Section 44 disallows firms from engaging cartel c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rowan, Tamsyn
Other Authors: Davis, Justice Dennis
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Law 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32343
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-32343
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-323432020-10-31T05:13:45Z The criminalisation of cartels in South Africa, United States and Australia and the effects of the Corporate Leniency Policy Rowan, Tamsyn Davis, Justice Dennis commercial law With the recent changes to the Competition Act1 , specifically with the inclusion of Section 73A2 which came into effect on the 1 May 2017 the amendment now makes provision for cartelists to face criminal charges for infringing Section 43 of the Act. Section 44 disallows firms from engaging cartel conduct and the objective of the recent amendment is to promote consumer welfare as well as to break the barriers to entry. Furthermore, allow for an open market and to promote the inclusion of all whom live in South Africa. To prohibit those involved in 'fixing of purchase' and or 'selling prices, dividing markets and/or involved collusive tendering amongst firms'. Despite the criminal sanctions created to deter cartels, firms or directors still are involved in collusive conduct. Cartel activity could not only be damaging to a firms' or directors' reputation, but also results in significant financial losses. With the recent implementation of S73A5 there is a more stern approach followed by our legislature by now holding directors of firms criminally liable for collusive conduct. What this paper seeks to address is the question as to whether the new developments made by the legislature allows for proper implementation in South Africa. Moreover, if the National Prosecuting Authority as the authoritative body has the competency to fully deal with the complexity of cartels. The South African model will be carefully examined against the backdrop of the United States and Australian advanced antitrust laws. Equally, as important also looking at what makes the United States and Australia more effective in their cartel detection and prevention. Particular attention will be given to the leniency policy which plays a pivotal role in prohibiting cartel conduct. And how criminal and civil sanctions should be considered in conjunction with leniency in an attempt to deter and eliminate cartel conduct. 2020-10-29T10:13:36Z 2020-10-29T10:13:36Z 2020 2020-10-29T10:13:07Z Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32343 eng application/pdf Faculty of Law Department of Commercial Law
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic commercial law
spellingShingle commercial law
Rowan, Tamsyn
The criminalisation of cartels in South Africa, United States and Australia and the effects of the Corporate Leniency Policy
description With the recent changes to the Competition Act1 , specifically with the inclusion of Section 73A2 which came into effect on the 1 May 2017 the amendment now makes provision for cartelists to face criminal charges for infringing Section 43 of the Act. Section 44 disallows firms from engaging cartel conduct and the objective of the recent amendment is to promote consumer welfare as well as to break the barriers to entry. Furthermore, allow for an open market and to promote the inclusion of all whom live in South Africa. To prohibit those involved in 'fixing of purchase' and or 'selling prices, dividing markets and/or involved collusive tendering amongst firms'. Despite the criminal sanctions created to deter cartels, firms or directors still are involved in collusive conduct. Cartel activity could not only be damaging to a firms' or directors' reputation, but also results in significant financial losses. With the recent implementation of S73A5 there is a more stern approach followed by our legislature by now holding directors of firms criminally liable for collusive conduct. What this paper seeks to address is the question as to whether the new developments made by the legislature allows for proper implementation in South Africa. Moreover, if the National Prosecuting Authority as the authoritative body has the competency to fully deal with the complexity of cartels. The South African model will be carefully examined against the backdrop of the United States and Australian advanced antitrust laws. Equally, as important also looking at what makes the United States and Australia more effective in their cartel detection and prevention. Particular attention will be given to the leniency policy which plays a pivotal role in prohibiting cartel conduct. And how criminal and civil sanctions should be considered in conjunction with leniency in an attempt to deter and eliminate cartel conduct.
author2 Davis, Justice Dennis
author_facet Davis, Justice Dennis
Rowan, Tamsyn
author Rowan, Tamsyn
author_sort Rowan, Tamsyn
title The criminalisation of cartels in South Africa, United States and Australia and the effects of the Corporate Leniency Policy
title_short The criminalisation of cartels in South Africa, United States and Australia and the effects of the Corporate Leniency Policy
title_full The criminalisation of cartels in South Africa, United States and Australia and the effects of the Corporate Leniency Policy
title_fullStr The criminalisation of cartels in South Africa, United States and Australia and the effects of the Corporate Leniency Policy
title_full_unstemmed The criminalisation of cartels in South Africa, United States and Australia and the effects of the Corporate Leniency Policy
title_sort criminalisation of cartels in south africa, united states and australia and the effects of the corporate leniency policy
publisher Faculty of Law
publishDate 2020
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32343
work_keys_str_mv AT rowantamsyn thecriminalisationofcartelsinsouthafricaunitedstatesandaustraliaandtheeffectsofthecorporateleniencypolicy
AT rowantamsyn criminalisationofcartelsinsouthafricaunitedstatesandaustraliaandtheeffectsofthecorporateleniencypolicy
_version_ 1719354294284582912