Anti-avoidance, amendments and anomalies: The impact of select anti-avoidance provisions and their subsequent amendments on employee share incentive schemes operating through trusts

Employee share incentive schemes have become a common phenomenon in companies world-wide and are an established method of allowing the employee to hold equity in the company which in turn allows the employee to personally benefit from the growth and profitability of the company. In light of the fact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kleynhans, Marike
Other Authors: Johnson, Tracy
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Commerce 2019
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30101
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-30101
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-301012020-10-06T05:10:58Z Anti-avoidance, amendments and anomalies: The impact of select anti-avoidance provisions and their subsequent amendments on employee share incentive schemes operating through trusts Kleynhans, Marike Johnson, Tracy Employee share incentive schemes have become a common phenomenon in companies world-wide and are an established method of allowing the employee to hold equity in the company which in turn allows the employee to personally benefit from the growth and profitability of the company. In light of the fact that employees receive remuneration by virtue of their employment and through their participation in these employee share schemes, the tax treatment of this remuneration should be considered in terms of the South African taxation laws. The Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 has been amended over time so as to introduce various anti-avoidance rules aimed at preventing employee participants in these schemes from classifying income received by virtue of employment as either dividends or capital gains. These anti-avoidance provisions, contained in sections 8C and 10(1)(k)(i) and the Eighth Schedule to the ITA, have evolved since their introduction, so as to: 1. address any anomalies and to close perceived loopholes identified in terms of these provisions; and 2. to clarify the circumstances in which these provisions will find application. This study highlights the evolution of these anti-avoidance provisions and discusses (a) whether the amendments succeeded in addressing the anomalies and closing loopholes as intended; and (b) whether the amendments inadvertently created any additional anomalies. An analysis of the current wording of the anti-avoidance provisions is conducted and the impact these provisions on the most prevalent employee share schemes operating through trusts is explored, whereafter suggestions for further amendments to the ITA are proposed. 2019-05-15T08:05:08Z 2019-05-15T08:05:08Z 2018 2019-05-13T13:43:45Z Master Thesis Masters MCom http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30101 eng application/pdf Faculty of Commerce Department of Finance and Tax
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
description Employee share incentive schemes have become a common phenomenon in companies world-wide and are an established method of allowing the employee to hold equity in the company which in turn allows the employee to personally benefit from the growth and profitability of the company. In light of the fact that employees receive remuneration by virtue of their employment and through their participation in these employee share schemes, the tax treatment of this remuneration should be considered in terms of the South African taxation laws. The Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 has been amended over time so as to introduce various anti-avoidance rules aimed at preventing employee participants in these schemes from classifying income received by virtue of employment as either dividends or capital gains. These anti-avoidance provisions, contained in sections 8C and 10(1)(k)(i) and the Eighth Schedule to the ITA, have evolved since their introduction, so as to: 1. address any anomalies and to close perceived loopholes identified in terms of these provisions; and 2. to clarify the circumstances in which these provisions will find application. This study highlights the evolution of these anti-avoidance provisions and discusses (a) whether the amendments succeeded in addressing the anomalies and closing loopholes as intended; and (b) whether the amendments inadvertently created any additional anomalies. An analysis of the current wording of the anti-avoidance provisions is conducted and the impact these provisions on the most prevalent employee share schemes operating through trusts is explored, whereafter suggestions for further amendments to the ITA are proposed.
author2 Johnson, Tracy
author_facet Johnson, Tracy
Kleynhans, Marike
author Kleynhans, Marike
spellingShingle Kleynhans, Marike
Anti-avoidance, amendments and anomalies: The impact of select anti-avoidance provisions and their subsequent amendments on employee share incentive schemes operating through trusts
author_sort Kleynhans, Marike
title Anti-avoidance, amendments and anomalies: The impact of select anti-avoidance provisions and their subsequent amendments on employee share incentive schemes operating through trusts
title_short Anti-avoidance, amendments and anomalies: The impact of select anti-avoidance provisions and their subsequent amendments on employee share incentive schemes operating through trusts
title_full Anti-avoidance, amendments and anomalies: The impact of select anti-avoidance provisions and their subsequent amendments on employee share incentive schemes operating through trusts
title_fullStr Anti-avoidance, amendments and anomalies: The impact of select anti-avoidance provisions and their subsequent amendments on employee share incentive schemes operating through trusts
title_full_unstemmed Anti-avoidance, amendments and anomalies: The impact of select anti-avoidance provisions and their subsequent amendments on employee share incentive schemes operating through trusts
title_sort anti-avoidance, amendments and anomalies: the impact of select anti-avoidance provisions and their subsequent amendments on employee share incentive schemes operating through trusts
publisher Faculty of Commerce
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30101
work_keys_str_mv AT kleynhansmarike antiavoidanceamendmentsandanomaliestheimpactofselectantiavoidanceprovisionsandtheirsubsequentamendmentsonemployeeshareincentiveschemesoperatingthroughtrusts
_version_ 1719347885842104320