I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging
Fallists belong to a constellation of radical student activist movements that pledge to disturb and reimagine South African society. Rather than restricting themselves to coordinated forms of collective action, Fallists’ advance their “revolution-as-becoming” within a context of everyday resistance...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Dissertation |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Cape Town
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28358 |
id |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-28358 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-283582020-10-06T05:11:36Z I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging Chen, Jon Adam Ndlovu, Musawenkosi Media Theory & Practice Fallists belong to a constellation of radical student activist movements that pledge to disturb and reimagine South African society. Rather than restricting themselves to coordinated forms of collective action, Fallists’ advance their “revolution-as-becoming” within a context of everyday resistance (Haynes & Prakash, 1991; Molefe, 2015). In this dissertation, I propose that Fallists form an “emerging networked counterpublic” made up of individual activists that enact everyday forms of resistance on Twitter (Jackson & Foucault Welles, 2016:399). This dissertation explores the use of Twitter by a microblogger who has emerged organically as a “crowdsourced elite” among Fallists (Papacharissi & de Fatima Oliveira, 2012). I contend that this microblogger exemplifies the repertoires of communication and resistance that pervade within Fallist networks on Twitter (Jackson & Foucault Welles, 2016). The microblogger is identified through methods of observation and social network analysis (SNA). “#whitetip,” a Twitter hashtag network that exemplifies Fallist communication and resistance, informs the interpretive content analysis that follows. This analysis is conducted on the tweets that the microblogger broadcast between 1 April and 30 September 2016. Tweets are categorised according to “evaluative frames” that emerged inductively during the course of analysis. I find that “resentment,” “pride and care,” and “play” made up the vast majority of evaluative frames. The microblogger employs the platform in a manner that disturbs dominant understandings of public sphere communication: the microblogger’s tweets are evaluative rather than deliberative, and assert a marginal, embodied subjectivity (Papacharissi, 2014; Warner, 2002). 2018-08-31T12:23:09Z 2018-08-31T12:23:09Z 2017 Master Thesis Masters MA http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28358 eng application/pdf University of Cape Town Faculty of Humanities Centre for Film and Media Studies |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Dissertation |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Media Theory & Practice |
spellingShingle |
Media Theory & Practice Chen, Jon Adam I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging |
description |
Fallists belong to a constellation of radical student activist movements that pledge to disturb and reimagine South African society. Rather than restricting themselves to coordinated forms of collective action, Fallists’ advance their “revolution-as-becoming” within a context of everyday resistance (Haynes & Prakash, 1991; Molefe, 2015). In this dissertation, I propose that Fallists form an “emerging networked counterpublic” made up of individual activists that enact everyday forms of resistance on Twitter (Jackson & Foucault Welles, 2016:399). This dissertation explores the use of Twitter by a microblogger who has emerged organically as a “crowdsourced elite” among Fallists (Papacharissi & de Fatima Oliveira, 2012). I contend that this microblogger exemplifies the repertoires of communication and resistance that pervade within Fallist networks on Twitter (Jackson & Foucault Welles, 2016). The microblogger is identified through methods of observation and social network analysis (SNA). “#whitetip,” a Twitter hashtag network that exemplifies Fallist communication and resistance, informs the interpretive content analysis that follows. This analysis is conducted on the tweets that the microblogger broadcast between 1 April and 30 September 2016. Tweets are categorised according to “evaluative frames” that emerged inductively during the course of analysis. I find that “resentment,” “pride and care,” and “play” made up the vast majority of evaluative frames. The microblogger employs the platform in a manner that disturbs dominant understandings of public sphere communication: the microblogger’s tweets are evaluative rather than deliberative, and assert a marginal, embodied subjectivity (Papacharissi, 2014; Warner, 2002). |
author2 |
Ndlovu, Musawenkosi |
author_facet |
Ndlovu, Musawenkosi Chen, Jon Adam |
author |
Chen, Jon Adam |
author_sort |
Chen, Jon Adam |
title |
I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging |
title_short |
I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging |
title_full |
I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging |
title_fullStr |
I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging |
title_full_unstemmed |
I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging |
title_sort |
i write what we like: a textual analysis of fallist microblogging |
publisher |
University of Cape Town |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28358 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chenjonadam iwritewhatwelikeatextualanalysisoffallistmicroblogging |
_version_ |
1719350044023324672 |