I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging

Fallists belong to a constellation of radical student activist movements that pledge to disturb and reimagine South African society. Rather than restricting themselves to coordinated forms of collective action, Fallists’ advance their “revolution-as-becoming” within a context of everyday resistance...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chen, Jon Adam
Other Authors: Ndlovu, Musawenkosi
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: University of Cape Town 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28358
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-28358
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-283582020-10-06T05:11:36Z I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging Chen, Jon Adam Ndlovu, Musawenkosi Media Theory & Practice Fallists belong to a constellation of radical student activist movements that pledge to disturb and reimagine South African society. Rather than restricting themselves to coordinated forms of collective action, Fallists’ advance their “revolution-as-becoming” within a context of everyday resistance (Haynes & Prakash, 1991; Molefe, 2015). In this dissertation, I propose that Fallists form an “emerging networked counterpublic” made up of individual activists that enact everyday forms of resistance on Twitter (Jackson & Foucault Welles, 2016:399). This dissertation explores the use of Twitter by a microblogger who has emerged organically as a “crowdsourced elite” among Fallists (Papacharissi & de Fatima Oliveira, 2012). I contend that this microblogger exemplifies the repertoires of communication and resistance that pervade within Fallist networks on Twitter (Jackson & Foucault Welles, 2016). The microblogger is identified through methods of observation and social network analysis (SNA). “#whitetip,” a Twitter hashtag network that exemplifies Fallist communication and resistance, informs the interpretive content analysis that follows. This analysis is conducted on the tweets that the microblogger broadcast between 1 April and 30 September 2016. Tweets are categorised according to “evaluative frames” that emerged inductively during the course of analysis. I find that “resentment,” “pride and care,” and “play” made up the vast majority of evaluative frames. The microblogger employs the platform in a manner that disturbs dominant understandings of public sphere communication: the microblogger’s tweets are evaluative rather than deliberative, and assert a marginal, embodied subjectivity (Papacharissi, 2014; Warner, 2002). 2018-08-31T12:23:09Z 2018-08-31T12:23:09Z 2017 Master Thesis Masters MA http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28358 eng application/pdf University of Cape Town Faculty of Humanities Centre for Film and Media Studies
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic Media Theory & Practice
spellingShingle Media Theory & Practice
Chen, Jon Adam
I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging
description Fallists belong to a constellation of radical student activist movements that pledge to disturb and reimagine South African society. Rather than restricting themselves to coordinated forms of collective action, Fallists’ advance their “revolution-as-becoming” within a context of everyday resistance (Haynes & Prakash, 1991; Molefe, 2015). In this dissertation, I propose that Fallists form an “emerging networked counterpublic” made up of individual activists that enact everyday forms of resistance on Twitter (Jackson & Foucault Welles, 2016:399). This dissertation explores the use of Twitter by a microblogger who has emerged organically as a “crowdsourced elite” among Fallists (Papacharissi & de Fatima Oliveira, 2012). I contend that this microblogger exemplifies the repertoires of communication and resistance that pervade within Fallist networks on Twitter (Jackson & Foucault Welles, 2016). The microblogger is identified through methods of observation and social network analysis (SNA). “#whitetip,” a Twitter hashtag network that exemplifies Fallist communication and resistance, informs the interpretive content analysis that follows. This analysis is conducted on the tweets that the microblogger broadcast between 1 April and 30 September 2016. Tweets are categorised according to “evaluative frames” that emerged inductively during the course of analysis. I find that “resentment,” “pride and care,” and “play” made up the vast majority of evaluative frames. The microblogger employs the platform in a manner that disturbs dominant understandings of public sphere communication: the microblogger’s tweets are evaluative rather than deliberative, and assert a marginal, embodied subjectivity (Papacharissi, 2014; Warner, 2002).
author2 Ndlovu, Musawenkosi
author_facet Ndlovu, Musawenkosi
Chen, Jon Adam
author Chen, Jon Adam
author_sort Chen, Jon Adam
title I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging
title_short I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging
title_full I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging
title_fullStr I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging
title_full_unstemmed I write what we like: A textual analysis of Fallist microblogging
title_sort i write what we like: a textual analysis of fallist microblogging
publisher University of Cape Town
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/28358
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjonadam iwritewhatwelikeatextualanalysisoffallistmicroblogging
_version_ 1719350044023324672