The role of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in the management of pancreatic trauma

Background: Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) has various applications in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic trauma. The utility of ERP in pancreatic trauma presenting to a level 1 equivalent trauma centre was analysed. Methods: Patients who sustained pancreatic trauma and underwen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomson, David Alexander
Other Authors: Krige, J E J
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: University of Cape Town 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11427/14312
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-14312
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-143122020-12-02T05:11:51Z The role of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in the management of pancreatic trauma Thomson, David Alexander Krige, J E J Surgery Pancreatic Trauma Background: Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) has various applications in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic trauma. The utility of ERP in pancreatic trauma presenting to a level 1 equivalent trauma centre was analysed. Methods: Patients who sustained pancreatic trauma and underwent ERP were identified. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, time to presentation, diagnostic modalities, associated injuries, clinical management, endoscopic interventions and their timing, surgical treatment and patient outcomes were recorded. Results: Forty-eight patients with pancreatic trauma were referred for ERP after blunt (26), gunshot (15), or stab (7) injury. The average time from injury to ERP was 38 days (range 2 – 365). An ERP visualized the duct in 47 patients. Twenty-four patients had a pancreatic fistula, 12 patients had a main pancreatic duct stricture or cut-off and 10 patients had a pseudocyst. Endoscopic interventions were pancreatic duct sphincterotomy (15), pancreatic duct stent (7) or pseudocyst drainage (6). Ten patients demonstrated minor injuries and no interventions were performed. One patient had a normal pancreatogram. Ten patients required pancreatic surgery following ERP (distal pancreatectomy n=6, pancreaticojejenostomy n=3 and cystjejenostomy n=1). One patient unable to tolerate ERP had a distal pancreatectomy. Conclusion: The majority of ERPs were performed post surgery or after a delayed presentation. Diagnostic success was high and in conjunction with therapeutic interventions 77% of patients avoided surgery for their pancreatic complications. ERP is an effective tool in the delayed management of the local complications of pancreatic trauma. 2015-10-25T17:05:31Z 2015-10-25T17:05:31Z 2012 Master Thesis Masters MMed http://hdl.handle.net/11427/14312 eng application/pdf University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Surgery
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic Surgery
Pancreatic Trauma
spellingShingle Surgery
Pancreatic Trauma
Thomson, David Alexander
The role of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in the management of pancreatic trauma
description Background: Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) has various applications in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic trauma. The utility of ERP in pancreatic trauma presenting to a level 1 equivalent trauma centre was analysed. Methods: Patients who sustained pancreatic trauma and underwent ERP were identified. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, time to presentation, diagnostic modalities, associated injuries, clinical management, endoscopic interventions and their timing, surgical treatment and patient outcomes were recorded. Results: Forty-eight patients with pancreatic trauma were referred for ERP after blunt (26), gunshot (15), or stab (7) injury. The average time from injury to ERP was 38 days (range 2 – 365). An ERP visualized the duct in 47 patients. Twenty-four patients had a pancreatic fistula, 12 patients had a main pancreatic duct stricture or cut-off and 10 patients had a pseudocyst. Endoscopic interventions were pancreatic duct sphincterotomy (15), pancreatic duct stent (7) or pseudocyst drainage (6). Ten patients demonstrated minor injuries and no interventions were performed. One patient had a normal pancreatogram. Ten patients required pancreatic surgery following ERP (distal pancreatectomy n=6, pancreaticojejenostomy n=3 and cystjejenostomy n=1). One patient unable to tolerate ERP had a distal pancreatectomy. Conclusion: The majority of ERPs were performed post surgery or after a delayed presentation. Diagnostic success was high and in conjunction with therapeutic interventions 77% of patients avoided surgery for their pancreatic complications. ERP is an effective tool in the delayed management of the local complications of pancreatic trauma.
author2 Krige, J E J
author_facet Krige, J E J
Thomson, David Alexander
author Thomson, David Alexander
author_sort Thomson, David Alexander
title The role of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in the management of pancreatic trauma
title_short The role of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in the management of pancreatic trauma
title_full The role of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in the management of pancreatic trauma
title_fullStr The role of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in the management of pancreatic trauma
title_full_unstemmed The role of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in the management of pancreatic trauma
title_sort role of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in the management of pancreatic trauma
publisher University of Cape Town
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/14312
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsondavidalexander theroleofendoscopicretrogradepancreatographyinthemanagementofpancreatictrauma
AT thomsondavidalexander roleofendoscopicretrogradepancreatographyinthemanagementofpancreatictrauma
_version_ 1719363354173112320