The contact stabilization activated sludge process

Includes bibliographical references. === In 1978 Ekama and Marais put forward a general model for the activated sludge process based on an energy requirement for adsorption of the nutrient onto the organisms. They briefly outlined an alternative bi-substrate hypothesis in which the energy requirem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexander, William Versfeld
Other Authors: Marais, Gerrit van Rooyen
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: University of Cape Town 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12587
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-12587
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-125872021-11-14T05:16:00Z The contact stabilization activated sludge process Alexander, William Versfeld Marais, Gerrit van Rooyen Civil Engineering Includes bibliographical references. In 1978 Ekama and Marais put forward a general model for the activated sludge process based on an energy requirement for adsorption of the nutrient onto the organisms. They briefly outlined an alternative bi-substrate hypothesis in which the energy requirement for adsorption fell away. No evidence in support of this alternative hypothesis was presented. The objective of this thesis was to investigate which of the two hypotheses gave the better description of the activated sludge process kinetics. When the adsorption hypothesis was replaced by the bi-substrate hypothesis in the general model and applied to the completely mixed activated sludge process and their predictions compared with experimental data, it was not possible to establish conclusively which hypothesis is to be preferred. As a consequence it was decided to test the two models under extreme conditions. The contact stabilization process was selected as the one presenting a most severe test of the predictive power of any hypothesis on activated sludge kinetics, and most likely therefore to establish the superiority of one hypothesis over the other. In order to obtain experimental data against which the hypotheses could be evaluated a series of laboratory scale tests on the contact stabilization process were conducted under time invariant and cyclic flow and load conditions at two temperatures, 12°C and 20°C. From a comparison of the experimentally observed and theoretically predicted data it was concluded that an additional factor had to be taken into account before a valid comparison could be made - whereas the general activated sludge theory accepted a rapid and complete enmeshment of influent particulate COD, in the contact reactor the experimental data indicated incomplete enmeshment in the short contact time available. When allowance was made for partial enmeshment in the predicted response of the system it was concluded that the bi-substrate hypothesis was superior to the adsorption one. 2015-03-09T13:54:11Z 2015-03-09T13:54:11Z 1979 Master Thesis Masters MSc http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12587 eng application/pdf University of Cape Town Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment Department of Civil Engineering
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic Civil Engineering
spellingShingle Civil Engineering
Alexander, William Versfeld
The contact stabilization activated sludge process
description Includes bibliographical references. === In 1978 Ekama and Marais put forward a general model for the activated sludge process based on an energy requirement for adsorption of the nutrient onto the organisms. They briefly outlined an alternative bi-substrate hypothesis in which the energy requirement for adsorption fell away. No evidence in support of this alternative hypothesis was presented. The objective of this thesis was to investigate which of the two hypotheses gave the better description of the activated sludge process kinetics. When the adsorption hypothesis was replaced by the bi-substrate hypothesis in the general model and applied to the completely mixed activated sludge process and their predictions compared with experimental data, it was not possible to establish conclusively which hypothesis is to be preferred. As a consequence it was decided to test the two models under extreme conditions. The contact stabilization process was selected as the one presenting a most severe test of the predictive power of any hypothesis on activated sludge kinetics, and most likely therefore to establish the superiority of one hypothesis over the other. In order to obtain experimental data against which the hypotheses could be evaluated a series of laboratory scale tests on the contact stabilization process were conducted under time invariant and cyclic flow and load conditions at two temperatures, 12°C and 20°C. From a comparison of the experimentally observed and theoretically predicted data it was concluded that an additional factor had to be taken into account before a valid comparison could be made - whereas the general activated sludge theory accepted a rapid and complete enmeshment of influent particulate COD, in the contact reactor the experimental data indicated incomplete enmeshment in the short contact time available. When allowance was made for partial enmeshment in the predicted response of the system it was concluded that the bi-substrate hypothesis was superior to the adsorption one.
author2 Marais, Gerrit van Rooyen
author_facet Marais, Gerrit van Rooyen
Alexander, William Versfeld
author Alexander, William Versfeld
author_sort Alexander, William Versfeld
title The contact stabilization activated sludge process
title_short The contact stabilization activated sludge process
title_full The contact stabilization activated sludge process
title_fullStr The contact stabilization activated sludge process
title_full_unstemmed The contact stabilization activated sludge process
title_sort contact stabilization activated sludge process
publisher University of Cape Town
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12587
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderwilliamversfeld thecontactstabilizationactivatedsludgeprocess
AT alexanderwilliamversfeld contactstabilizationactivatedsludgeprocess
_version_ 1719493743564816384