Gender differences in mathematics: A discourse analysis
Perspectives dealing with the study of gender and mathematics have failed generally to move beyond the individual/society divide. The contradictory nature of subjectivity and the operation and interpenetration of power and knowledge have not been taken into account. This article is based on the post...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publications Ltd
1995
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1014524 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/008124639502500308 |
| Summary: | Perspectives dealing with the study of gender and mathematics have failed generally to move beyond the individual/society divide. The contradictory nature of subjectivity and the operation and interpenetration of power and knowledge have not been taken into account. This article is based on the post-structuralist framework. The work of Walkerdine, which highlights the processes within the classroom which allow girls to succeed in mathematics but never actually be successful, is of interest. The methodology used is that of discourse analysis which makes clear both the positionings available to the participants as well as the power relations formed. The sample was drawn from a top-achieving Std 8 Higher Grade class in an affluent Model C school. This represents a theoretically salient sample as the literature points to ‘gender differences’ being most pronounced in the upper levels of mathematics education. The analysis clearly highlights the double-bind within which girls find themselves in the mathematics classroom. The apparent equality of opportunity and non-sexism is counteracted by the positioning of girls as hard working but without natural flair in mathematics. The characteristics that make it possible to achieve in mathematics are ascribed to males. The resistance to this powerful ‘disciplinary technology’ is the invoking of the feminist discourse. === This article is affiliated to the Educational Psychology Department at the University of Cape Town and WITS Rural Facility === Full text available on publisher website: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/008124639502500308 |
|---|