Changing practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universities

publisher version === Bernstein’s concept of classification and framing links notions of knowledge, democracy and social justice, providing a perspective from which to address critical questions of what knowledge is produced, who has access to it, and how knowledge is distributed. Bernstein’s concep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Little, Brenda, Abbas, Andrea, Singh, Mala
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Springer, Dordrecht 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10962/66934
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7369-0_8
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-rhodes-vital-29002
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-rhodes-vital-290022018-08-25T05:06:29ZChanging practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universitiesLittle, BrendaAbbas, AndreaSingh, Malapublisher versionBernstein’s concept of classification and framing links notions of knowledge, democracy and social justice, providing a perspective from which to address critical questions of what knowledge is produced, who has access to it, and how knowledge is distributed. Bernstein’s conceptual framework is used to inform an analysis of national policies steering knowledge production and knowledge transfer in the UK, and the changing practices and values associated with knowledge production and knowledge transfer in two UK institutional case study universities. The analysis reveals how reputational and financial consequences of the formal assessment of research quality interacts with the institutional and disciplinary contexts of research units to differently shape what knowledge is valued and produced, and with whom it is shared. Five discursive areas, each involving a complex set of classifications (power) and framings (control) are identified, namely: the national research assessment framework; the economic value of research; discourses of social and academic values; academic freedoms; and mixed-discipline research and the interdisciplinary nature of real world problems. Though competing and sometimes contradictory values seem to underlie academics’ knowledge work, it seems that the strong framing for knowledge production and knowledge exchange provided by national policies steers staff efforts towards economised codes of knowledge. The conclusion suggests that such a strong steer does not value social transformation in all its diverse non-economistic dimensions and limits universities’ potential to transform societies to further social justice.Springer, Dordrecht2016textbook21 pagespdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10962/66934vital:29002https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7369-0_8EnglishRe-becoming Universities?. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative PerspectiveSpringer Science+Business MediaUse of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the National Library of South Africa Copyright Act (http://www.nlsa.ac.za/downloads/Copyright%amp;20Act.pdf)
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description publisher version === Bernstein’s concept of classification and framing links notions of knowledge, democracy and social justice, providing a perspective from which to address critical questions of what knowledge is produced, who has access to it, and how knowledge is distributed. Bernstein’s conceptual framework is used to inform an analysis of national policies steering knowledge production and knowledge transfer in the UK, and the changing practices and values associated with knowledge production and knowledge transfer in two UK institutional case study universities. The analysis reveals how reputational and financial consequences of the formal assessment of research quality interacts with the institutional and disciplinary contexts of research units to differently shape what knowledge is valued and produced, and with whom it is shared. Five discursive areas, each involving a complex set of classifications (power) and framings (control) are identified, namely: the national research assessment framework; the economic value of research; discourses of social and academic values; academic freedoms; and mixed-discipline research and the interdisciplinary nature of real world problems. Though competing and sometimes contradictory values seem to underlie academics’ knowledge work, it seems that the strong framing for knowledge production and knowledge exchange provided by national policies steers staff efforts towards economised codes of knowledge. The conclusion suggests that such a strong steer does not value social transformation in all its diverse non-economistic dimensions and limits universities’ potential to transform societies to further social justice.
author Little, Brenda
Abbas, Andrea
Singh, Mala
spellingShingle Little, Brenda
Abbas, Andrea
Singh, Mala
Changing practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universities
author_facet Little, Brenda
Abbas, Andrea
Singh, Mala
author_sort Little, Brenda
title Changing practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universities
title_short Changing practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universities
title_full Changing practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universities
title_fullStr Changing practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universities
title_full_unstemmed Changing practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universities
title_sort changing practices, changing values?: a bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two uk universities
publisher Springer, Dordrecht
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10962/66934
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7369-0_8
work_keys_str_mv AT littlebrenda changingpracticeschangingvaluesabernsteiniananalysisofknowledgeproductionandknowledgeexchangeintwoukuniversities
AT abbasandrea changingpracticeschangingvaluesabernsteiniananalysisofknowledgeproductionandknowledgeexchangeintwoukuniversities
AT singhmala changingpracticeschangingvaluesabernsteiniananalysisofknowledgeproductionandknowledgeexchangeintwoukuniversities
_version_ 1718727059131334656