Changing practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universities
publisher version === Bernstein’s concept of classification and framing links notions of knowledge, democracy and social justice, providing a perspective from which to address critical questions of what knowledge is produced, who has access to it, and how knowledge is distributed. Bernstein’s concep...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer, Dordrecht
2016
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10962/66934 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7369-0_8 |
id |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-rhodes-vital-29002 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-rhodes-vital-290022018-08-25T05:06:29ZChanging practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universitiesLittle, BrendaAbbas, AndreaSingh, Malapublisher versionBernstein’s concept of classification and framing links notions of knowledge, democracy and social justice, providing a perspective from which to address critical questions of what knowledge is produced, who has access to it, and how knowledge is distributed. Bernstein’s conceptual framework is used to inform an analysis of national policies steering knowledge production and knowledge transfer in the UK, and the changing practices and values associated with knowledge production and knowledge transfer in two UK institutional case study universities. The analysis reveals how reputational and financial consequences of the formal assessment of research quality interacts with the institutional and disciplinary contexts of research units to differently shape what knowledge is valued and produced, and with whom it is shared. Five discursive areas, each involving a complex set of classifications (power) and framings (control) are identified, namely: the national research assessment framework; the economic value of research; discourses of social and academic values; academic freedoms; and mixed-discipline research and the interdisciplinary nature of real world problems. Though competing and sometimes contradictory values seem to underlie academics’ knowledge work, it seems that the strong framing for knowledge production and knowledge exchange provided by national policies steers staff efforts towards economised codes of knowledge. The conclusion suggests that such a strong steer does not value social transformation in all its diverse non-economistic dimensions and limits universities’ potential to transform societies to further social justice.Springer, Dordrecht2016textbook21 pagespdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10962/66934vital:29002https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7369-0_8EnglishRe-becoming Universities?. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative PerspectiveSpringer Science+Business MediaUse of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the National Library of South Africa Copyright Act (http://www.nlsa.ac.za/downloads/Copyright%amp;20Act.pdf) |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
publisher version === Bernstein’s concept of classification and framing links notions of knowledge, democracy and social justice, providing a perspective from which to address critical questions of what knowledge is produced, who has access to it, and how knowledge is distributed. Bernstein’s conceptual framework is used to inform an analysis of national policies steering knowledge production and knowledge transfer in the UK, and the changing practices and values associated with knowledge production and knowledge transfer in two UK institutional case study universities. The analysis reveals how reputational and financial consequences of the formal assessment of research quality interacts with the institutional and disciplinary contexts of research units to differently shape what knowledge is valued and produced, and with whom it is shared. Five discursive areas, each involving a complex set of classifications (power) and framings (control) are identified, namely: the national research assessment framework; the economic value of research; discourses of social and academic values; academic freedoms; and mixed-discipline research and the interdisciplinary nature of real world problems. Though competing and sometimes contradictory values seem to underlie academics’ knowledge work, it seems that the strong framing for knowledge production and knowledge exchange provided by national policies steers staff efforts towards economised codes of knowledge. The conclusion suggests that such a strong steer does not value social transformation in all its diverse non-economistic dimensions and limits universities’ potential to transform societies to further social justice. |
author |
Little, Brenda Abbas, Andrea Singh, Mala |
spellingShingle |
Little, Brenda Abbas, Andrea Singh, Mala Changing practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universities |
author_facet |
Little, Brenda Abbas, Andrea Singh, Mala |
author_sort |
Little, Brenda |
title |
Changing practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universities |
title_short |
Changing practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universities |
title_full |
Changing practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universities |
title_fullStr |
Changing practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Changing practices, changing values?: a Bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two UK universities |
title_sort |
changing practices, changing values?: a bernsteinian analysis of knowledge production and knowledge exchange in two uk universities |
publisher |
Springer, Dordrecht |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10962/66934 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7369-0_8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT littlebrenda changingpracticeschangingvaluesabernsteiniananalysisofknowledgeproductionandknowledgeexchangeintwoukuniversities AT abbasandrea changingpracticeschangingvaluesabernsteiniananalysisofknowledgeproductionandknowledgeexchangeintwoukuniversities AT singhmala changingpracticeschangingvaluesabernsteiniananalysisofknowledgeproductionandknowledgeexchangeintwoukuniversities |
_version_ |
1718727059131334656 |