Ideas of poetic form: aspects of the Romantic-Symbolist tradition
The subject of the work is some of the formal and technical developments of modern poetry in the Romantic-Symbolist tradition. These developments were stimulated partly by the ideas of the non-intellectual Symbol inherited from the Romantics and the idea that poetry could be a musical medium inherit...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Rhodes University
2016
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10962/54554 |
id |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-rhodes-vital-26587 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-rhodes-vital-265872017-09-29T16:01:40ZIdeas of poetic form: aspects of the Romantic-Symbolist traditionOldert, DavidThe subject of the work is some of the formal and technical developments of modern poetry in the Romantic-Symbolist tradition. These developments were stimulated partly by the ideas of the non-intellectual Symbol inherited from the Romantics and the idea that poetry could be a musical medium inherited from some of the French Symbolists. Their combined influence led to a number of technical problems in the structuring of imagery and the handling of syntax. The work begins, therefore, by tracing the philosophical assumptions behind the ideas of the Symbol and of the musical analogy. I then go on to examine two of the difficulties that these ideas produced. One is the tension between the analogical structure of a poem’s imagery and its metaphorical texture: quite simply, the more compressed and complex a poet’s metaphors become, the more they tend to disrupt the poem’s structure of imagery. The other problem is obscurity, which is caused by insufficient objectification of private images in a symbolic structure, and by fused metaphor, which is essentially a metaphor with an obscured ground of resemblance. Finally, I show how these difficulties were solved by poets outside the tradition who used a more articulate kind of syntax, yet who also managed to combine that syntax with the ideal of symbolic form. The implicit argument, then, is that the Romantic-Symbolist ideas of form, and the New Critics’ theories of form which were largely based on them, are able to elucidate an essentially different kind of poetry, and thus have some degree of truth and use beyond the tradition that generated them.Rhodes UniversityFaculty of Humanities, English2016textThesisMastersMA63 leavespdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10962/54554vital:26587EnglishOldert, David |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
The subject of the work is some of the formal and technical developments of modern poetry in the Romantic-Symbolist tradition. These developments were stimulated partly by the ideas of the non-intellectual Symbol inherited from the Romantics and the idea that poetry could be a musical medium inherited from some of the French Symbolists. Their combined influence led to a number of technical problems in the structuring of imagery and the handling of syntax. The work begins, therefore, by tracing the philosophical assumptions behind the ideas of the Symbol and of the musical analogy. I then go on to examine two of the difficulties that these ideas produced. One is the tension between the analogical structure of a poem’s imagery and its metaphorical texture: quite simply, the more compressed and complex a poet’s metaphors become, the more they tend to disrupt the poem’s structure of imagery. The other problem is obscurity, which is caused by insufficient objectification of private images in a symbolic structure, and by fused metaphor, which is essentially a metaphor with an obscured ground of resemblance. Finally, I show how these difficulties were solved by poets outside the tradition who used a more articulate kind of syntax, yet who also managed to combine that syntax with the ideal of symbolic form. The implicit argument, then, is that the Romantic-Symbolist ideas of form, and the New Critics’ theories of form which were largely based on them, are able to elucidate an essentially different kind of poetry, and thus have some degree of truth and use beyond the tradition that generated them. |
author |
Oldert, David |
spellingShingle |
Oldert, David Ideas of poetic form: aspects of the Romantic-Symbolist tradition |
author_facet |
Oldert, David |
author_sort |
Oldert, David |
title |
Ideas of poetic form: aspects of the Romantic-Symbolist tradition |
title_short |
Ideas of poetic form: aspects of the Romantic-Symbolist tradition |
title_full |
Ideas of poetic form: aspects of the Romantic-Symbolist tradition |
title_fullStr |
Ideas of poetic form: aspects of the Romantic-Symbolist tradition |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ideas of poetic form: aspects of the Romantic-Symbolist tradition |
title_sort |
ideas of poetic form: aspects of the romantic-symbolist tradition |
publisher |
Rhodes University |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10962/54554 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT oldertdavid ideasofpoeticformaspectsoftheromanticsymbolisttradition |
_version_ |
1718541665167212544 |