An investigation into Science teachers’ conceptions of and dispositions towards the implementation of ‘assessment for learning’ (formative assessment) during science practical activities

• Main Author: Sheehama, Felisia Nauyele
• Format: Others
• Language: English
• Published: Rhodes University 2017
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/50166

Assessment is an integral part of the teaching and learning process. Research by the Assessment Reform Group (ARG) (1999) and others has shown that assessment for learning, or formative assessment, is one of the most powerful educational tools for promoting effective learning and improving performance. Assessment for learning (formative assessment) and summative assessment form part of most national education policies and is advocated in the Namibian curricula. However, most of the focus of official programs in Namibia has been on summative assessment resulting in assessment for learning being neglected. It is against this backdrop that this study investigated science teachers’ conceptions of, and dispositions towards, the implementation of assessment for learning during science practical lessons. In this study, a mixed methods case study approach underpinned by an interpretive paradigm was adopted. The research was conducted with 25 in-service science teachers from schools in Namibia who were all on a two year part-time BEd (Honours) program delivered at NIED in Namibia by a South African university from the Eastern Cape. To generate data, document analysis, questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, an intervention in the form of workshops on assessment for learning, practical activities, lesson observations (which were videotaped), as well as teacher reflections were used. The lesson observations were conducted in two schools in the Omusati region of Namibia. The theoretical frameworks guiding the study were Vygotsky’s social constructivist theory and Shulman’s pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). The findings of the study revealed that teachers held different notions toward assessment for learning before the intervention in the form of a workshop. However, after the workshop the teachers demonstrated understanding of what assessment for learning entails and how it can be implemented during hands-on practical activities using easily accessible resources. A recommendation is that if teachers are given opportunities, through professional development platforms, to engage in hands-on practical activities using easily accessible resources and an appropriate orientation towards assessment for learning that includes model strategies they can be enabled and motivated to research and begin to implement assessment for learning in their science classrooms.