An enquiry into some present-day attitudes in art education and their relationship to the current alienation of artist from society

• Main Author: Rodger, John Neil
• Format: Others
• Language: English
• Published: Rhodes University 1973
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/6574

From Introduction: "We can't teach these kids anything, man, they are so pure and unspoiled. Anything we show them or any discipline we impose upon them will only corrupt their purity. It's best if they just stay home and do their own thing”. "If your instructor says he knows what art is, watch out.” These two statements, the first by an instructor at a prominent New York art school, the second by one of America's respected critics, are the sort of talk one might expect to hear at any gathering of the avent-garde . To hear them said in and about the art school puts things in a different light. They are indicative -of the sort of thing that is preached and practised by a sufficient proportion of the art- educational force in the Western world to constitute a crisis unparalleled in the entire history of art education. Unopposed, such views must rapidly spell death for the institution. They must also, if they reached the proportions their authors appear to hope for, ensure a universal visual illiteracy unequalled in any other age. Of course statements like this, archly delivered by the very people who would suffer the most immediate loss at their implementation, are not at all true reflections of the whole state of art education in our time, or those people would simply not be in a position to make them. There are a great many people in the profession who would wholeheartedly reject such statements, and this faction is by no means confined to the older members.