Assessment of fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of water quality stress in South Africa

• Main Author: Holland, Alexandra Jennifer
• Format: Others
• Language: English
• Published: Rhodes University 2016
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/430

South Africa’s freshwater resources are facing numerous water quality challenges and need to be protected from degradation and pollution by appropriate management strategies as they are a limited and shared resource. The South African Scoring System (SASS5), which assesses macroinvertebrate communities at family level, is used in routine monitoring of riverine ecosystems in South Africa. Assessing the condition of these ecosystems is limited as SASS5 does not allow for changes at lower levels of biological organisation to be detected. Fluctuating asymmetry (FA) - small random deviations from perfect symmetry - is considered a direct measure of developmental instability. This phenotypical response results from numerous internal and external factors and has a low level of heritability. FA is based on sound scientific principles, easy to measure, biologically robust and cost-effective. It reflects synergistic interactions between stressors and provides an integrated measure of several anthropogenic stresses, which strengthens the assertion that FA is an environmental indicator of water quality stress, and can potentially be used to detect stress in populations before irreversible effects manifest. FA responses were investigated by (1) exposing freshwater shrimp to increasing concentrations of cadmium chloride in a long-term experiment and (2) comparing FA responses to water quality changes and macroinvertebrate community responses in two case studies (Kwazulu-Natal and Limpopo Province) in South Africa. Although no consistent concentration-response curve could be established, this study suggests that FA responses can be used as a sublethal endpoint in exposure experiments. Determining water quality parameters causing FA responses was not possible in field collected freshwater shrimp in either case study. Although FA did not specifically respond to any of the measured water quality parameters identified in the case studies, it has potential as a general indicator of water quality stress in freshwater shrimp. This study shows that FA responses are potentially more sensitive than macroinvertebrate community responses to pollution since it is not affected by habitat. Since FA has the potential to be a general indicator of population quality, particularly where there are natural habitat differences, it can be useful at the level of biomonitoring required for routine basic river status assessments in South Africa. However, in order for FA to become a robust tool that can be used routinely in conjunction with SASS5 more research is required.