| Summary: | Aims and objectives: The research aims and objectives of this thesis were: (i) to review literature
pertaining to different dermal exposure assessment methods; (ii) to assess dermal exposure of refinery
workers to nickel and/or cobalt by making use of skin wipes as a removal method; (iii) to assess
concurrently the skin condition of the above mentioned workers by measuring skin hydration,
transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin surface pH, and (iv) to compare South African skin
notations and sensitisation notations with those of other developed countries.
Methods: Refinery workers from two base metal refineries participated in this study. Skin condition
and dermal exposure was measured on different anatomical areas before, during and at the end of a
work shift. Dermal exposure to nickel and/or cobalt was assessed with Ghostwipes
TM
as a removal
method. Wipe samples of potentially contaminated surfaces in the workplace were also collected.
Wipes were analysed for nickel and/or cobalt according to NIOSH method 9102, using Inductively
Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry. The assignment and use of skin notations and
sensitisation notations in South African legislation and six other developed countries were compared.
Results: To date, occupational dermal exposure has been reported for numerous substances by
making use of surrogate skin methods (interception methods), removal methods and fluorescent tracer
methods (in situ detection methods). From published literature it is evident that skin (dermal) wipes,
as a removal method, are the most appropriate method to assess dermal exposure to metals. Varying
degrees of skin dryness (low hydration indices) and impaired barrier function (high TEWL indices)
are reported, with the hands being implicated the most. However, normal skin condition is also
reported for some anatomical areas. Skin surface pH for all anatomical areas sampled decreased
significantly during the shift, but remained in normal range. Dermal exposure to nickel occurred
during the shift at the electro-winning plant of one refinery, while dermal co-exposure to cobalt and
nickel occurred at the cobalt plant of the other refinery. At both of the refineries, cobalt and/or nickel
was collected from the workers’ skin even before the shift. Also, dermal exposure to these metals was
highly variable between individual workers. Skin notations in South African legislation had a mean
agreement of between 42.9% and 45.8% with other countries, while agreement for sensitisation
notations was only 3.6% between countries. === Thesis (Ph.D. (Occupational Hygiene))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.
|
|---|
