Evaluation of restoration and management actions in the Molopo savanna of South Africa :|ban integrative perspective / Christiaan Johannes Harmse

The loss of ecosystem resilience and rangeland (often referred to as veld in South Africa) productivity is a major problem in the semi-arid Savanna environments of southern Africa. The over-utilization of rangelands in the Molopo region of the North- West Province in South Africa has resulted in pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Harmse, Christiaan Johannes
Language:en
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10394/10729
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-nwu-oai-dspace.nwu.ac.za-10394-10729
record_format oai_dc
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Integrated assessment
Stakeholder participation
Indicator identification
Bush thickening
Chemical control
Rangeland condition
Grass
Woody ratio
Geïntegreerde assessering
Deelname van belanghebbendes
Indikator identifikasie
Bosverdigting
Chemiese beheer
Gras-houtagtige verhouding
spellingShingle Integrated assessment
Stakeholder participation
Indicator identification
Bush thickening
Chemical control
Rangeland condition
Grass
Woody ratio
Geïntegreerde assessering
Deelname van belanghebbendes
Indikator identifikasie
Bosverdigting
Chemiese beheer
Gras-houtagtige verhouding
Harmse, Christiaan Johannes
Evaluation of restoration and management actions in the Molopo savanna of South Africa :|ban integrative perspective / Christiaan Johannes Harmse
description The loss of ecosystem resilience and rangeland (often referred to as veld in South Africa) productivity is a major problem in the semi-arid Savanna environments of southern Africa. The over-utilization of rangelands in the Molopo region of the North- West Province in South Africa has resulted in profound habitat transformations. A common regional indicator of rangeland degradation is the imbalance in the grasswoody ratio, characterized by a loss of grass cover and density with increased shrub or tree density. This can result in major reductions of rangeland productivity for the grazing animal, forcing land users to apply active or passive restoration actions to improve rangeland condition, control the thickening of woody species (bush thickening), mitigate economic losses and restoring the aesthetical value of the Savanna environment for ecotourism and game hunting aspects. This study formed part of the multinational EU-funded PRACTICE project (“Prevention and restoration actions to combat desertification: an integrated assessment”). The first aim of the study was to evaluate locally applied restoration actions using a participatory approach, followed by interviews with certain stakeholders that formed part of a multi-stakeholder platform (MSP) related to the livestock and game farming community in the Molopo. Participants of the MSP ranked indicators according to their relative importance regarding the restoration actions on an individual basis. The individual ranking results were combined with quantitative bio-physical and qualitative socio-economic measurements for each indicator in a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), whereby the alternative actions were ranked according to their relevancy and performance. The results were then shared with members of the MSP in order to stimulate discussion among the members and contribute to the social learning of the project outcome. The overall positive response and acceptance of results by members of the MSP changed the perceptions and objectives of the land users regarding rangeland management. This type of participatory assessment was therefore found to be very promising in helping to identify more sustainable actions to mitigate rangeland degradation in the Molopo Savanna region. There is, however, still an urgent need to create legal policy frameworks and institution-building, to support local-level implementation in all socio-ecological and economic settings, particularly in communal areas. The second aim was to evaluate the effect of two chemical bush control actions (chemical hand- (HC) and aeroplane control (AC)) as well as rotational grazing (RGM) on the Molopo Savanna vegetation. Results show that rangeland productivity, i.e. forage production and grazing capacity, was found to be negatively related to the woody phytomass in the savanna system studied. Bush thickening influenced grass species composition which was commonly associated with a decline in the abundance of sub-climax to climax grasses, respectively. All three actions (HC, AC & RGM) significantly reduced the woody phytomass and increased forage production and grazing capacity. Although AC resulted in the highest reduction of woody phytomass, the highest forage production and grazing capacity was found under RGM. The second highest grazing capacity was found in HC sites, which was due to a high abundance of perennial, palatable climax grass species. Results from this study also show that the patterns and compositions of grass species, grass functional groups (GFGs) and woody densities indicated by RGM and chemical HC, best resemble a productive and stable savanna system that provides important key resources to support both grazing and browsing herbivores. === MSc (Environmental Sciences), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014
author Harmse, Christiaan Johannes
author_facet Harmse, Christiaan Johannes
author_sort Harmse, Christiaan Johannes
title Evaluation of restoration and management actions in the Molopo savanna of South Africa :|ban integrative perspective / Christiaan Johannes Harmse
title_short Evaluation of restoration and management actions in the Molopo savanna of South Africa :|ban integrative perspective / Christiaan Johannes Harmse
title_full Evaluation of restoration and management actions in the Molopo savanna of South Africa :|ban integrative perspective / Christiaan Johannes Harmse
title_fullStr Evaluation of restoration and management actions in the Molopo savanna of South Africa :|ban integrative perspective / Christiaan Johannes Harmse
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of restoration and management actions in the Molopo savanna of South Africa :|ban integrative perspective / Christiaan Johannes Harmse
title_sort evaluation of restoration and management actions in the molopo savanna of south africa :|ban integrative perspective / christiaan johannes harmse
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10394/10729
work_keys_str_mv AT harmsechristiaanjohannes evaluationofrestorationandmanagementactionsinthemoloposavannaofsouthafricabanintegrativeperspectivechristiaanjohannesharmse
_version_ 1716715295264997376
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-nwu-oai-dspace.nwu.ac.za-10394-107292014-09-30T04:04:33ZEvaluation of restoration and management actions in the Molopo savanna of South Africa :|ban integrative perspective / Christiaan Johannes HarmseHarmse, Christiaan JohannesIntegrated assessmentStakeholder participationIndicator identificationBush thickeningChemical controlRangeland conditionGrassWoody ratioGeïntegreerde assesseringDeelname van belanghebbendesIndikator identifikasieBosverdigtingChemiese beheerGras-houtagtige verhoudingThe loss of ecosystem resilience and rangeland (often referred to as veld in South Africa) productivity is a major problem in the semi-arid Savanna environments of southern Africa. The over-utilization of rangelands in the Molopo region of the North- West Province in South Africa has resulted in profound habitat transformations. A common regional indicator of rangeland degradation is the imbalance in the grasswoody ratio, characterized by a loss of grass cover and density with increased shrub or tree density. This can result in major reductions of rangeland productivity for the grazing animal, forcing land users to apply active or passive restoration actions to improve rangeland condition, control the thickening of woody species (bush thickening), mitigate economic losses and restoring the aesthetical value of the Savanna environment for ecotourism and game hunting aspects. This study formed part of the multinational EU-funded PRACTICE project (“Prevention and restoration actions to combat desertification: an integrated assessment”). The first aim of the study was to evaluate locally applied restoration actions using a participatory approach, followed by interviews with certain stakeholders that formed part of a multi-stakeholder platform (MSP) related to the livestock and game farming community in the Molopo. Participants of the MSP ranked indicators according to their relative importance regarding the restoration actions on an individual basis. The individual ranking results were combined with quantitative bio-physical and qualitative socio-economic measurements for each indicator in a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), whereby the alternative actions were ranked according to their relevancy and performance. The results were then shared with members of the MSP in order to stimulate discussion among the members and contribute to the social learning of the project outcome. The overall positive response and acceptance of results by members of the MSP changed the perceptions and objectives of the land users regarding rangeland management. This type of participatory assessment was therefore found to be very promising in helping to identify more sustainable actions to mitigate rangeland degradation in the Molopo Savanna region. There is, however, still an urgent need to create legal policy frameworks and institution-building, to support local-level implementation in all socio-ecological and economic settings, particularly in communal areas. The second aim was to evaluate the effect of two chemical bush control actions (chemical hand- (HC) and aeroplane control (AC)) as well as rotational grazing (RGM) on the Molopo Savanna vegetation. Results show that rangeland productivity, i.e. forage production and grazing capacity, was found to be negatively related to the woody phytomass in the savanna system studied. Bush thickening influenced grass species composition which was commonly associated with a decline in the abundance of sub-climax to climax grasses, respectively. All three actions (HC, AC & RGM) significantly reduced the woody phytomass and increased forage production and grazing capacity. Although AC resulted in the highest reduction of woody phytomass, the highest forage production and grazing capacity was found under RGM. The second highest grazing capacity was found in HC sites, which was due to a high abundance of perennial, palatable climax grass species. Results from this study also show that the patterns and compositions of grass species, grass functional groups (GFGs) and woody densities indicated by RGM and chemical HC, best resemble a productive and stable savanna system that provides important key resources to support both grazing and browsing herbivores.MSc (Environmental Sciences), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 20142014-06-25T10:11:19Z2014-06-25T10:11:19Z2013Thesishttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/10729en