Identifying and evaluating risk factors that predict traumatic stress severity in South Africa

Background: This study identified, addressed and validated risk factors that can be measured in the peri-traumatic period which may eventually be used in predicting the development of traumatic stress. Many people in South Africa possibly suffer from Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) if we consid...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Van Wyk, Rozelle
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1020937
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-nmmu-vital-9968
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-nmmu-vital-99682017-12-21T04:22:43ZIdentifying and evaluating risk factors that predict traumatic stress severity in South AfricaVan Wyk, RozellePost-traumatic stress disorder -- Risk factorsMedical personnel -- South AfricaBackground: This study identified, addressed and validated risk factors that can be measured in the peri-traumatic period which may eventually be used in predicting the development of traumatic stress. Many people in South Africa possibly suffer from Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) if we consider the extent of trauma exposures that is apparent within the South African population. Traumatised individuals are at risk but may remain undiagnosed and untreated. It makes sense for first line and primary health care practitioners (i.e., not highly qualified psychological practitioners) to screen for risk since they have the initial contact with trauma individuals. A relatively easy screening instrument that can be administered time efficiently would be useful in this regard. The principles of this instrument are that it needs to be objectively measurable, quick and easy to administer. No consistent measure geared towards identifying risk factors in such a manner immediately post trauma currently exists in South Africa. Objectives: The overall aim was to start a process of designing a psychometric instrument that is valid in predicting the development of traumatic stress. Since this is the initial stage of constructing a new measure, content validity was of utmost importance. It became imperative to ensure that items were not only relevant and appropriate, but also accurate and capable in identifying at-risk individuals. The proposed end goal is to develop effective identification strategies in South Africa geared towards helping victims of traumatic events. Method: A pilot psychometric questionnaire was compiled using three major international reviews, South African research on known risk factors, and literature on PTSD risk assessment considerations. This preliminary assembled item pool was used as a departure point and evaluated quantitatively as well as qualitatively by expert reviewers who have research and/or clinical experience with PTSD in a South African context. Their feedback resulted in either the omission or the modification of certain items; for some items, further exploration was recommended. The questionnaire was further scrutinised and modified accordingly after qualitative interviews with and critical feedback from the intended administrators or primary health care professionals, namely Registered Counsellors (RCs) and/or nursing staff from a participating general government hospital and a non-government organisation. Findings: Expert reviewers did not agree consistently across all the items. At times they rated certain items as relevant according to the necessity of the information rather than with regards to the relevance of the content of the item – in terms of prediction of PTSD. It was also observed that intended administrators did not always agree with expert reviewers.Nelson Mandela Metropolitan UniversityFaculty of Health Sciences2013ThesisMastersMAxvii, 292 leavespdfvital:9968http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1020937EnglishNelson Mandela Metropolitan University
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Post-traumatic stress disorder -- Risk factors
Medical personnel -- South Africa
spellingShingle Post-traumatic stress disorder -- Risk factors
Medical personnel -- South Africa
Van Wyk, Rozelle
Identifying and evaluating risk factors that predict traumatic stress severity in South Africa
description Background: This study identified, addressed and validated risk factors that can be measured in the peri-traumatic period which may eventually be used in predicting the development of traumatic stress. Many people in South Africa possibly suffer from Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) if we consider the extent of trauma exposures that is apparent within the South African population. Traumatised individuals are at risk but may remain undiagnosed and untreated. It makes sense for first line and primary health care practitioners (i.e., not highly qualified psychological practitioners) to screen for risk since they have the initial contact with trauma individuals. A relatively easy screening instrument that can be administered time efficiently would be useful in this regard. The principles of this instrument are that it needs to be objectively measurable, quick and easy to administer. No consistent measure geared towards identifying risk factors in such a manner immediately post trauma currently exists in South Africa. Objectives: The overall aim was to start a process of designing a psychometric instrument that is valid in predicting the development of traumatic stress. Since this is the initial stage of constructing a new measure, content validity was of utmost importance. It became imperative to ensure that items were not only relevant and appropriate, but also accurate and capable in identifying at-risk individuals. The proposed end goal is to develop effective identification strategies in South Africa geared towards helping victims of traumatic events. Method: A pilot psychometric questionnaire was compiled using three major international reviews, South African research on known risk factors, and literature on PTSD risk assessment considerations. This preliminary assembled item pool was used as a departure point and evaluated quantitatively as well as qualitatively by expert reviewers who have research and/or clinical experience with PTSD in a South African context. Their feedback resulted in either the omission or the modification of certain items; for some items, further exploration was recommended. The questionnaire was further scrutinised and modified accordingly after qualitative interviews with and critical feedback from the intended administrators or primary health care professionals, namely Registered Counsellors (RCs) and/or nursing staff from a participating general government hospital and a non-government organisation. Findings: Expert reviewers did not agree consistently across all the items. At times they rated certain items as relevant according to the necessity of the information rather than with regards to the relevance of the content of the item – in terms of prediction of PTSD. It was also observed that intended administrators did not always agree with expert reviewers.
author Van Wyk, Rozelle
author_facet Van Wyk, Rozelle
author_sort Van Wyk, Rozelle
title Identifying and evaluating risk factors that predict traumatic stress severity in South Africa
title_short Identifying and evaluating risk factors that predict traumatic stress severity in South Africa
title_full Identifying and evaluating risk factors that predict traumatic stress severity in South Africa
title_fullStr Identifying and evaluating risk factors that predict traumatic stress severity in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Identifying and evaluating risk factors that predict traumatic stress severity in South Africa
title_sort identifying and evaluating risk factors that predict traumatic stress severity in south africa
publisher Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1020937
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwykrozelle identifyingandevaluatingriskfactorsthatpredicttraumaticstressseverityinsouthafrica
_version_ 1718565589945942016