Legal privilege in tax matters

In South Africa the boundaries of the common law principle of legal professional privilege in tax matters is unclear. Common law legal professional privilege in South Africa and in other jurisdictions has been a right available only to clients of attorneys. In 2015, amendments were enacted in sectio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Delport, Jacqueline Hayley
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10948/12637
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-nmmu-vital-27101
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-nmmu-vital-271012017-12-21T04:22:31ZLegal privilege in tax mattersDelport, Jacqueline HayleyTax administration and procedureTax consultantsIn South Africa the boundaries of the common law principle of legal professional privilege in tax matters is unclear. Common law legal professional privilege in South Africa and in other jurisdictions has been a right available only to clients of attorneys. In 2015, amendments were enacted in section 42A of the Tax Administration Laws Amendment Act. These amendments set out further requirements that need to be satisfied for a taxpayer to claim his right to legal professional privilege over particular communications. The amendment does not feature any recognition of the extension of legal professional privilege for which all non-attorney tax practitioners have been lobbying for since the enactment of the Tax Administration Act. The stance taken by SARS in its non-response to the pleas for extension of legal professional privilege have both Constitutional and administrative consequences: constitutional consequences in the form of the infringement of the non-attorney tax practitioner’s right to equality and the taxpayer’s right to privacy: administrative consequences arise in the form of an infringement of an individual’s right to fair administrative justice under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act. Foreign jurisdictions have been considered to determine whether South African is operating in line with international standards relating to legal professional privilege. Although, not every foreign jurisdiction examined for the purpose of this study, has implemented an extension of legal professional privilege, they have still ruled on the matter, or implemented an alternative solution, for example, a accountant concession for accountants. On this basis it is submitted that South Africa must implement a new provision within the Tax Administration Act defining the extension of legal professional privilege by law.Nelson Mandela Metropolitan UniversityFaculty of Law2016ThesisMastersLLMxii, 130 leavespdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10948/12637vital:27101EnglishNelson Mandela Metropolitan University
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Tax administration and procedure
Tax consultants

spellingShingle Tax administration and procedure
Tax consultants

Delport, Jacqueline Hayley
Legal privilege in tax matters
description In South Africa the boundaries of the common law principle of legal professional privilege in tax matters is unclear. Common law legal professional privilege in South Africa and in other jurisdictions has been a right available only to clients of attorneys. In 2015, amendments were enacted in section 42A of the Tax Administration Laws Amendment Act. These amendments set out further requirements that need to be satisfied for a taxpayer to claim his right to legal professional privilege over particular communications. The amendment does not feature any recognition of the extension of legal professional privilege for which all non-attorney tax practitioners have been lobbying for since the enactment of the Tax Administration Act. The stance taken by SARS in its non-response to the pleas for extension of legal professional privilege have both Constitutional and administrative consequences: constitutional consequences in the form of the infringement of the non-attorney tax practitioner’s right to equality and the taxpayer’s right to privacy: administrative consequences arise in the form of an infringement of an individual’s right to fair administrative justice under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act. Foreign jurisdictions have been considered to determine whether South African is operating in line with international standards relating to legal professional privilege. Although, not every foreign jurisdiction examined for the purpose of this study, has implemented an extension of legal professional privilege, they have still ruled on the matter, or implemented an alternative solution, for example, a accountant concession for accountants. On this basis it is submitted that South Africa must implement a new provision within the Tax Administration Act defining the extension of legal professional privilege by law.
author Delport, Jacqueline Hayley
author_facet Delport, Jacqueline Hayley
author_sort Delport, Jacqueline Hayley
title Legal privilege in tax matters
title_short Legal privilege in tax matters
title_full Legal privilege in tax matters
title_fullStr Legal privilege in tax matters
title_full_unstemmed Legal privilege in tax matters
title_sort legal privilege in tax matters
publisher Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10948/12637
work_keys_str_mv AT delportjacquelinehayley legalprivilegeintaxmatters
_version_ 1718564377560350720