Approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South Africa
Historical ad hoc allocations of land for biodiversity conservation have led to a biased representation of habitat within the Cape Floristic Region, with Protected Areas concentrated in upland areas at high altitudes and on steep slopes. The field of Conservation Planning developed to ensure that al...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10948/4122 |
id |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-nmmu-vital-20548 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-nmmu-vital-205482017-12-21T04:22:32ZApproaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South AfricaSouthey, Phillippa KateBiodiversity conservation -- South Africa -- Western CapeConservation of natural resources -- South Africa -- Western CapeHistorical ad hoc allocations of land for biodiversity conservation have led to a biased representation of habitat within the Cape Floristic Region, with Protected Areas concentrated in upland areas at high altitudes and on steep slopes. The field of Conservation Planning developed to ensure that allocations of areas to Protected status no longer result in such bias and rather promotes the persistence of biodiversity. This study reviewed a recent allocation of land to biodiversity conservation within Western Cape of South Africa, using both a quantitative and qualitative approach, to determine their value to biodiversity conservation. The area was previously used for commercial forestry but now has been allocated to conservation land-uses. The allocation was based on the area’s value to the forestry industry. The qualitative approach in this study engaged with relevant stakeholder groups to map priority areas, while the quantitative approach used available data on biodiversity features to map priority areas. Neither approach determined that the area allocated is in its full extent a priority for biodiversity conservation. This indicated that in the current era of Conservation Planning, Protected Areas are still being allocated in an ad hoc manner, as a result of their limited perceived benefit to anthropocentric needs. The future allocation of land to biodiversity conservation should rather integrate expert knowledge and available quantifiable data to ensure that priority areas for biodiversity conservation are being protected.Nelson Mandela Metropolitan UniversityFaculty of Science2015ThesisMastersMScix, 85 leavespdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10948/4122vital:20548EnglishNelson Mandela Metropolitan University |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Biodiversity conservation -- South Africa -- Western Cape Conservation of natural resources -- South Africa -- Western Cape |
spellingShingle |
Biodiversity conservation -- South Africa -- Western Cape Conservation of natural resources -- South Africa -- Western Cape Southey, Phillippa Kate Approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South Africa |
description |
Historical ad hoc allocations of land for biodiversity conservation have led to a biased representation of habitat within the Cape Floristic Region, with Protected Areas concentrated in upland areas at high altitudes and on steep slopes. The field of Conservation Planning developed to ensure that allocations of areas to Protected status no longer result in such bias and rather promotes the persistence of biodiversity. This study reviewed a recent allocation of land to biodiversity conservation within Western Cape of South Africa, using both a quantitative and qualitative approach, to determine their value to biodiversity conservation. The area was previously used for commercial forestry but now has been allocated to conservation land-uses. The allocation was based on the area’s value to the forestry industry. The qualitative approach in this study engaged with relevant stakeholder groups to map priority areas, while the quantitative approach used available data on biodiversity features to map priority areas. Neither approach determined that the area allocated is in its full extent a priority for biodiversity conservation. This indicated that in the current era of Conservation Planning, Protected Areas are still being allocated in an ad hoc manner, as a result of their limited perceived benefit to anthropocentric needs. The future allocation of land to biodiversity conservation should rather integrate expert knowledge and available quantifiable data to ensure that priority areas for biodiversity conservation are being protected. |
author |
Southey, Phillippa Kate |
author_facet |
Southey, Phillippa Kate |
author_sort |
Southey, Phillippa Kate |
title |
Approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South Africa |
title_short |
Approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South Africa |
title_full |
Approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South Africa |
title_fullStr |
Approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South Africa |
title_sort |
approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the western cape pf south africa |
publisher |
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10948/4122 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT southeyphillippakate approachesintheprioritisationofareasforbiodiversityconservationacasestudyfromthewesterncapepfsouthafrica |
_version_ |
1718564309047443456 |