Approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South Africa

Historical ad hoc allocations of land for biodiversity conservation have led to a biased representation of habitat within the Cape Floristic Region, with Protected Areas concentrated in upland areas at high altitudes and on steep slopes. The field of Conservation Planning developed to ensure that al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Southey, Phillippa Kate
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10948/4122
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-nmmu-vital-20548
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-nmmu-vital-205482017-12-21T04:22:32ZApproaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South AfricaSouthey, Phillippa KateBiodiversity conservation -- South Africa -- Western CapeConservation of natural resources -- South Africa -- Western CapeHistorical ad hoc allocations of land for biodiversity conservation have led to a biased representation of habitat within the Cape Floristic Region, with Protected Areas concentrated in upland areas at high altitudes and on steep slopes. The field of Conservation Planning developed to ensure that allocations of areas to Protected status no longer result in such bias and rather promotes the persistence of biodiversity. This study reviewed a recent allocation of land to biodiversity conservation within Western Cape of South Africa, using both a quantitative and qualitative approach, to determine their value to biodiversity conservation. The area was previously used for commercial forestry but now has been allocated to conservation land-uses. The allocation was based on the area’s value to the forestry industry. The qualitative approach in this study engaged with relevant stakeholder groups to map priority areas, while the quantitative approach used available data on biodiversity features to map priority areas. Neither approach determined that the area allocated is in its full extent a priority for biodiversity conservation. This indicated that in the current era of Conservation Planning, Protected Areas are still being allocated in an ad hoc manner, as a result of their limited perceived benefit to anthropocentric needs. The future allocation of land to biodiversity conservation should rather integrate expert knowledge and available quantifiable data to ensure that priority areas for biodiversity conservation are being protected.Nelson Mandela Metropolitan UniversityFaculty of Science2015ThesisMastersMScix, 85 leavespdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10948/4122vital:20548EnglishNelson Mandela Metropolitan University
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Biodiversity conservation -- South Africa -- Western Cape
Conservation of natural resources -- South Africa -- Western Cape
spellingShingle Biodiversity conservation -- South Africa -- Western Cape
Conservation of natural resources -- South Africa -- Western Cape
Southey, Phillippa Kate
Approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South Africa
description Historical ad hoc allocations of land for biodiversity conservation have led to a biased representation of habitat within the Cape Floristic Region, with Protected Areas concentrated in upland areas at high altitudes and on steep slopes. The field of Conservation Planning developed to ensure that allocations of areas to Protected status no longer result in such bias and rather promotes the persistence of biodiversity. This study reviewed a recent allocation of land to biodiversity conservation within Western Cape of South Africa, using both a quantitative and qualitative approach, to determine their value to biodiversity conservation. The area was previously used for commercial forestry but now has been allocated to conservation land-uses. The allocation was based on the area’s value to the forestry industry. The qualitative approach in this study engaged with relevant stakeholder groups to map priority areas, while the quantitative approach used available data on biodiversity features to map priority areas. Neither approach determined that the area allocated is in its full extent a priority for biodiversity conservation. This indicated that in the current era of Conservation Planning, Protected Areas are still being allocated in an ad hoc manner, as a result of their limited perceived benefit to anthropocentric needs. The future allocation of land to biodiversity conservation should rather integrate expert knowledge and available quantifiable data to ensure that priority areas for biodiversity conservation are being protected.
author Southey, Phillippa Kate
author_facet Southey, Phillippa Kate
author_sort Southey, Phillippa Kate
title Approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South Africa
title_short Approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South Africa
title_full Approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South Africa
title_fullStr Approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the Western Cape pf South Africa
title_sort approaches in the prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation: a case study from the western cape pf south africa
publisher Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10948/4122
work_keys_str_mv AT southeyphillippakate approachesintheprioritisationofareasforbiodiversityconservationacasestudyfromthewesterncapepfsouthafrica
_version_ 1718564309047443456