A comparative analysis of the Dream proving and Hahnemannian proving of an existing Homoeopathic remedy {Bitis arietans arietans}.
Mini-dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Homoeopathy, Homoeopathy at the Durban Institute of Technology, 2002. === Dream provings are considered to be a new era in Homoeopathy and as such are met with a lot of scepticism. T...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Others |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2771 |
| Summary: | Mini-dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Homoeopathy, Homoeopathy at the Durban Institute of Technology, 2002. === Dream provings are considered to be a new era in Homoeopathy and as such are met with a lot of scepticism. They involve getting in touch with the dynamic influence of the remedy and observing this influence on the vital force in the form of symptoms (Dam, 1998: 128). Dreams are a main focus of the proving as they are considered to be the 'royal way to the psycho-dynamic depth of the state of the remedy being proved' (Dam, 1998: 128). The motivations for their acceptance or rejection are both reasonable. To determine if they are provings that should appear in the Materia Medica and Repertory it needed to be seen if they revealed the same features of a remedy that a classical proving provides. === M |
|---|