The relative effectiveness of two different approaches to adjust a fixated segment in the treatment of facet syndrome in the cervical spine

Dissertation submitted in the partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Technikon Natal, 1996. === The aim of this investigation was to determine the relative efficacy of two approaches to adjusting for facet syndrome in the cervical spine....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cilliers, Karen Inez
Other Authors: Penter, C. S.
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10321/1986
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-dut-oai-ir.dut.ac.za-10321-1986
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-dut-oai-ir.dut.ac.za-10321-19862017-05-02T04:19:10Z The relative effectiveness of two different approaches to adjust a fixated segment in the treatment of facet syndrome in the cervical spine Cilliers, Karen Inez Penter, C. S. Chiropractic Dissertation submitted in the partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Technikon Natal, 1996. The aim of this investigation was to determine the relative efficacy of two approaches to adjusting for facet syndrome in the cervical spine. It was hypothesised that by adjusting the top segment of a primary fixation in the direction of the restriction, as well as the bottom segment in the opposite direction, there would be a significantly greater improvement than by only adjusting the top segment of a primary fixation in the direction of restriction. Thirty subjects, diagnosed as having cervical facet syndrome, were randomly divided into two treatment groups, each consisting of fifteen patients. The first treatment group received a single adjustment in the direction of the restriction only. The second treatment group had a bilateral adjustment: the top segment of the fixation in the direction of the restriction as well as the bottom segment in the opposite direction. Soft tissue therapy was used in both treatment groups as a preadjustment procedure. The research project was carried out where both groups received a maximum of eight treatments over a minimum of four weeks. After a follow-up period of a month the patients were re-assessed. Measurements of the cervical spine ranges of motion with the CROM goniometer and the completion of the Numerical Rating Scale 101, CMCC Neck Disability Index and the McGill Short Form questionnaires were performed before the first, fourth and final treatments as well as at the month fa IIowup consultation. M 2017-01-31T06:47:24Z 2017-01-31T06:47:24Z 1996 Thesis 37071 http://hdl.handle.net/10321/1986 en 137 p
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Chiropractic
spellingShingle Chiropractic
Cilliers, Karen Inez
The relative effectiveness of two different approaches to adjust a fixated segment in the treatment of facet syndrome in the cervical spine
description Dissertation submitted in the partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Technikon Natal, 1996. === The aim of this investigation was to determine the relative efficacy of two approaches to adjusting for facet syndrome in the cervical spine. It was hypothesised that by adjusting the top segment of a primary fixation in the direction of the restriction, as well as the bottom segment in the opposite direction, there would be a significantly greater improvement than by only adjusting the top segment of a primary fixation in the direction of restriction. Thirty subjects, diagnosed as having cervical facet syndrome, were randomly divided into two treatment groups, each consisting of fifteen patients. The first treatment group received a single adjustment in the direction of the restriction only. The second treatment group had a bilateral adjustment: the top segment of the fixation in the direction of the restriction as well as the bottom segment in the opposite direction. Soft tissue therapy was used in both treatment groups as a preadjustment procedure. The research project was carried out where both groups received a maximum of eight treatments over a minimum of four weeks. After a follow-up period of a month the patients were re-assessed. Measurements of the cervical spine ranges of motion with the CROM goniometer and the completion of the Numerical Rating Scale 101, CMCC Neck Disability Index and the McGill Short Form questionnaires were performed before the first, fourth and final treatments as well as at the month fa IIowup consultation. === M
author2 Penter, C. S.
author_facet Penter, C. S.
Cilliers, Karen Inez
author Cilliers, Karen Inez
author_sort Cilliers, Karen Inez
title The relative effectiveness of two different approaches to adjust a fixated segment in the treatment of facet syndrome in the cervical spine
title_short The relative effectiveness of two different approaches to adjust a fixated segment in the treatment of facet syndrome in the cervical spine
title_full The relative effectiveness of two different approaches to adjust a fixated segment in the treatment of facet syndrome in the cervical spine
title_fullStr The relative effectiveness of two different approaches to adjust a fixated segment in the treatment of facet syndrome in the cervical spine
title_full_unstemmed The relative effectiveness of two different approaches to adjust a fixated segment in the treatment of facet syndrome in the cervical spine
title_sort relative effectiveness of two different approaches to adjust a fixated segment in the treatment of facet syndrome in the cervical spine
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/10321/1986
work_keys_str_mv AT cillierskareninez therelativeeffectivenessoftwodifferentapproachestoadjustafixatedsegmentinthetreatmentoffacetsyndromeinthecervicalspine
AT cillierskareninez relativeeffectivenessoftwodifferentapproachestoadjustafixatedsegmentinthetreatmentoffacetsyndromeinthecervicalspine
_version_ 1718445995504697344