THE STATUS OF THE PROJECTION PRINCIPLE IN GOVERNMENT-BINDING THEORY
Published Article === The role of the Projection Principle within Chomsky's Government-Binding (GB) Theory is to preserve the subcategorisation properties of lexical items at all levels of syntactic representation, viz. D-structure, S-structure, and Lexical Form. Arguments have been made tha...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Journal for New Generation Sciences, Vol 6, Issue 2: Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11462/509 |
id |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-cut-oai-ir.cut.ac.za-11462-509 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-cut-oai-ir.cut.ac.za-11462-5092016-03-16T03:59:04Z THE STATUS OF THE PROJECTION PRINCIPLE IN GOVERNMENT-BINDING THEORY Vinger, Gift Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein Projection Principle Transformational Component Structure-Preserving Constraint Case Filter Theta Criterion Published Article The role of the Projection Principle within Chomsky's Government-Binding (GB) Theory is to preserve the subcategorisation properties of lexical items at all levels of syntactic representation, viz. D-structure, S-structure, and Lexical Form. Arguments have been made that the Projection Principle is a new concept that is simply an extension of theTransformational Component (XFM) and Emonds' Structure-Preserving Constraint (SPC), and that it does not deserve the high status it has been accorded in GB theory. This paper provides evidence, based on sentences involving movement operations, that the Projection Principle is innovative and that it convincingly addresses what theXFMandSPChave failed to address. 2015-09-22T10:45:50Z 2015-09-22T10:45:50Z 2008 2008 Article 16844998 http://hdl.handle.net/11462/509 en_US Journal for New Generation Sciences;Vol 6, Issue 2 Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein 215 614 bytes, 1 file Application/PDF Journal for New Generation Sciences, Vol 6, Issue 2: Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Projection Principle Transformational Component Structure-Preserving Constraint Case Filter Theta Criterion |
spellingShingle |
Projection Principle Transformational Component Structure-Preserving Constraint Case Filter Theta Criterion Vinger, Gift THE STATUS OF THE PROJECTION PRINCIPLE IN GOVERNMENT-BINDING THEORY |
description |
Published Article === The role of the Projection Principle within Chomsky's Government-Binding
(GB) Theory is to preserve the subcategorisation properties of lexical items at
all levels of syntactic representation, viz. D-structure, S-structure, and Lexical
Form. Arguments have been made that the Projection Principle is a new
concept that is simply an extension of theTransformational Component (XFM)
and Emonds' Structure-Preserving Constraint (SPC), and that it does not
deserve the high status it has been accorded in GB theory. This paper
provides evidence, based on sentences involving movement operations, that
the Projection Principle is innovative and that it convincingly addresses what
theXFMandSPChave failed to address. |
author2 |
Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein |
author_facet |
Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein Vinger, Gift |
author |
Vinger, Gift |
author_sort |
Vinger, Gift |
title |
THE STATUS OF THE PROJECTION PRINCIPLE IN GOVERNMENT-BINDING THEORY |
title_short |
THE STATUS OF THE PROJECTION PRINCIPLE IN GOVERNMENT-BINDING THEORY |
title_full |
THE STATUS OF THE PROJECTION PRINCIPLE IN GOVERNMENT-BINDING THEORY |
title_fullStr |
THE STATUS OF THE PROJECTION PRINCIPLE IN GOVERNMENT-BINDING THEORY |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE STATUS OF THE PROJECTION PRINCIPLE IN GOVERNMENT-BINDING THEORY |
title_sort |
status of the projection principle in government-binding theory |
publisher |
Journal for New Generation Sciences, Vol 6, Issue 2: Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11462/509 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vingergift thestatusoftheprojectionprincipleingovernmentbindingtheory AT vingergift statusoftheprojectionprincipleingovernmentbindingtheory |
_version_ |
1718204672503709696 |