Separation, Characterization and Fouling Potential of Sludge Waters from Different Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes
The major limitation, which hinders the wider application of membrane technology and increases the operating costs of membranes involved in wastewater treatment plants, is membrane fouling induced by organic matter. Extracellular polymeric products (EPS) and soluble microbial products (SMP) are the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en |
Published: |
2012
|
Online Access: | Xue, J. (2011). Separation, Characterization and Fouling Potential of Sludge Waters from Different Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes. KAUST Research Repository. https://doi.org/10.25781/KAUST-1DS71 http://hdl.handle.net/10754/209381 |
id |
ndltd-kaust.edu.sa-oai-repository.kaust.edu.sa-10754-209381 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-kaust.edu.sa-oai-repository.kaust.edu.sa-10754-2093812021-09-15T05:06:42Z Separation, Characterization and Fouling Potential of Sludge Waters from Different Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes Xue, Jinkai Amy, Gary L. Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE) Division Saikaly, Pascal Wei, Chunhai The major limitation, which hinders the wider application of membrane technology and increases the operating costs of membranes involved in wastewater treatment plants, is membrane fouling induced by organic matter. Extracellular polymeric products (EPS) and soluble microbial products (SMP) are the two most mentioned major foulants in publications, for which the debate on precise definitions seems to be endless. Therefore, a concept of sludge water, which conceptually covers both EPS and SMP, has been developed in this research. A standard procedure of sludge water separation, which is centrifugation at 4000g for 15 min followed by 1.2μm glass fiber filter filtration, was established based on separation experiments with membrane tank sludge from the KAUST MBR wastewater treatment plant. Afterwards, sludge waters from the KAUST MBR WWTP anoxic tank, aerobic tank and membrane tank as well as sludge waters from the Jeddah WWTP anoxic tank, aerobic tank and secondary effluent were produced through the previously developed standard procedure. The obtained sludge water samples were thereafter characterized with TOC/COD, LC--OCD and F--EEM, which showed that KAUST anoxic/ aerobic /membrane tank sludge waters had similar characteristics for all investigated parameters, yet the influent naturally had a higher DOC and biopolymer concentration. Moreover, lower TOC/COD, negligible biopolymers and low levels of humics were found in KAUST effluent. Compared with the KAUST MBR WWTP, the Jeddah WWTP’s sludge waters generally had higher DOC and biopolymer concentrations. To investigate sludge water fouling potential, the KAUST membrane tank sludge water as well as the Jeddah secondary effluent were filtrated through a membrane array consisting of an ultrafiltration (UF) Millipore RC10kDa at the first step followed by a nanofiltration (NF) KOCH Acid/Base stable NF200 at the second step. It was found that cake layer and standard blocking occurred simultaneously during both of these filtration processes. For the KAUST MBR membrane tank sludge water and the Jeddah WWTP effluent, the fouling potential of humic/building blocks was much higher than that of biopolymers. Compared with the KAUST MBR membrane tank sludge water, the Jeddah WWTP effluent had comparable biopolymer fouling potential and higher humic/building blocks fouling potential. 2012-02-04T08:29:39Z 2012-02-04T08:29:39Z 2011-07 Thesis Xue, J. (2011). Separation, Characterization and Fouling Potential of Sludge Waters from Different Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes. KAUST Research Repository. https://doi.org/10.25781/KAUST-1DS71 10.25781/KAUST-1DS71 http://hdl.handle.net/10754/209381 en |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
The
major
limitation,
which
hinders
the
wider
application
of
membrane
technology
and
increases
the
operating
costs
of
membranes
involved
in
wastewater
treatment
plants,
is
membrane
fouling
induced
by
organic
matter.
Extracellular
polymeric
products
(EPS)
and
soluble
microbial
products
(SMP)
are
the
two
most
mentioned
major
foulants
in
publications,
for
which
the
debate
on
precise
definitions
seems
to
be
endless.
Therefore,
a
concept
of
sludge
water,
which
conceptually
covers
both
EPS
and
SMP,
has
been
developed
in
this
research.
A
standard
procedure
of
sludge
water
separation,
which
is
centrifugation
at
4000g
for
15
min
followed
by
1.2μm
glass
fiber
filter
filtration,
was
established
based
on
separation
experiments
with
membrane
tank
sludge
from
the
KAUST
MBR
wastewater
treatment
plant.
Afterwards,
sludge
waters
from
the
KAUST
MBR
WWTP
anoxic
tank,
aerobic
tank
and
membrane
tank
as
well
as
sludge
waters
from
the
Jeddah
WWTP
anoxic
tank,
aerobic
tank
and
secondary
effluent
were
produced
through
the
previously
developed
standard
procedure. The
obtained
sludge
water
samples
were
thereafter
characterized
with
TOC/COD,
LC--OCD
and
F--EEM,
which
showed
that
KAUST
anoxic/
aerobic
/membrane
tank
sludge
waters
had
similar
characteristics
for
all
investigated
parameters,
yet
the
influent
naturally
had
a
higher
DOC
and
biopolymer
concentration.
Moreover,
lower
TOC/COD,
negligible
biopolymers
and
low
levels
of
humics
were
found
in
KAUST
effluent.
Compared
with
the
KAUST
MBR
WWTP,
the
Jeddah
WWTP’s
sludge
waters
generally
had
higher
DOC
and
biopolymer
concentrations.
To
investigate
sludge
water
fouling
potential,
the
KAUST
membrane
tank
sludge
water
as
well
as
the
Jeddah
secondary
effluent
were
filtrated
through
a
membrane
array
consisting
of
an
ultrafiltration
(UF)
Millipore
RC10kDa
at
the
first
step
followed
by
a
nanofiltration
(NF)
KOCH
Acid/Base
stable
NF200
at
the
second
step.
It
was
found
that
cake
layer
and
standard
blocking
occurred
simultaneously
during
both
of
these
filtration
processes.
For
the
KAUST
MBR
membrane
tank
sludge
water
and
the
Jeddah
WWTP
effluent,
the
fouling
potential
of
humic/building
blocks
was
much
higher
than
that
of
biopolymers.
Compared
with
the
KAUST
MBR
membrane
tank
sludge
water,
the
Jeddah
WWTP
effluent
had
comparable
biopolymer
fouling
potential
and
higher
humic/building
blocks
fouling
potential. |
author2 |
Amy, Gary L. |
author_facet |
Amy, Gary L. Xue, Jinkai |
author |
Xue, Jinkai |
spellingShingle |
Xue, Jinkai Separation, Characterization and Fouling Potential of Sludge Waters from Different Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes |
author_sort |
Xue, Jinkai |
title |
Separation, Characterization and Fouling Potential of Sludge Waters from Different Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes |
title_short |
Separation, Characterization and Fouling Potential of Sludge Waters from Different Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes |
title_full |
Separation, Characterization and Fouling Potential of Sludge Waters from Different Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes |
title_fullStr |
Separation, Characterization and Fouling Potential of Sludge Waters from Different Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Separation, Characterization and Fouling Potential of Sludge Waters from Different Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes |
title_sort |
separation, characterization and fouling potential of sludge waters from different biological wastewater treatment processes |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
Xue, J. (2011). Separation, Characterization and Fouling Potential of Sludge Waters from Different Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes. KAUST Research Repository. https://doi.org/10.25781/KAUST-1DS71 http://hdl.handle.net/10754/209381 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xuejinkai separationcharacterizationandfoulingpotentialofsludgewatersfromdifferentbiologicalwastewatertreatmentprocesses |
_version_ |
1719480884812316672 |